N/m initializers are way trickier than what we do in our web app. I would imagine you have to write your own intelligent initializer here to fallback to you own lang pack? I never tried it, so I won't know.... Count me outta this one :)
Have a great day, Paul Bors On Jul 8, 2013, at 2:35 AM, "Paul Borș" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, sorry then. Got that one wrong :( > > But wait, I think I overcome that in a similar way... We overwrite most > string (especially the NULL keys) for most messages. > > I don't have the code in front of me, but I recall we do it through the Lang > pack. > > Have a great day, > Paul Bors > > On Jul 8, 2013, at 2:29 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Paul. >> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Paul Borș <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> See the Wicket Free Guid section on the properties files. >>> https://wicket-guide.googlecode.com/files/Wicket%20free%20guide.pdf#page92 >>> >>> Long story short, you can define the language pack at your application >>> level and overrite the default labels Wicket ships with. >>> Per say, i use your "ubber" properties file (master properties file) >>> because of our translatiomn firm ;) >> >> William talks about wicket.properties (IInitializer), not >> Application.properties. >> >> >>> Have a great day, >>> Paul Bors >>> >>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 5:35 PM, William Speirs <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm attempting to create an uber JAR using the Maven shade plugin and >>>> running into an issue shading wicket, wicket-extensions and >>>> wicket-devutils. All 3 of these module contain a wicket.properties file >>>> that point at their respective Initializers. The problem >>>> is that when I >>>> create the shaded JAR, the wicket.properties files all want to live in >>> the >>>> same place and overwrite each other. I can combine them into a single >>>> wicket.properties file, but when the properties are loaded >>>> via addInitializer(properties.getProperty("initializer")); only the last >>>> one in the file is used. >>>> >>>> Has anyone ever created an uber JAR with wicket and wicket-extensions (I >>>> can drop wicket-devutils if needed)? If so, how did you do it? >>>> >>>> If I needed to hack this together, knowing the names of the Initializers, >>>> can I call them "manually"? >> >> I don't see another solution. >> Call them manually in the beginning of your MyApp#init() method. >> >> >>>> >>>> Thanks... >>>> >>>> Bill- >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
