Hi,

<wicket:xyz> tags are not rendered in deployment mode.
See IMarkupSettings#setStripWicketTags(boolean)


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Ben S <br...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi, I found the solution before receiving an answer.
>
> I found that using the wicket:container markup tags in development mode
> will actually work with setVisible toggling, but not in deployment mode. I
> don't know if this is due to me using the wicket:container tag incorrectly
> or not. For my solution I just switched the tags over to <div> tags. I
> realized after the fact I probably could have used panels as opposed to
> containers for the solution, but it's a bit too late for that now.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, November 7, 2013 9:12 AM, Ben S <br...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Here's the code and markup, I'll begin looking for any errors  I have
> made, thanks!
> http://pastebin.com/eVQfYCpx
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:20 AM, Nick Pratt <nbpr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> This functionality does work - can you put your code up on
> pastebin/gist/whatever so we can take a look? (Markup and Source please)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Ben S <br...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been trying to work on this issue for hours and have had no luck.
> >
> > Basically, my code works just fine in development mode as intended,
> > however when in Deployment mode I can't seem to get WebMarkupContainers
> > toggle between visibility.
> >
> > If they're visible, they won't go invisible, however if they are
> invisible
> > they will toggle visible.
> >
> > However, the markup containers seems to work as expected when the form is
> > passed to the AjaxRequestTarget,  however this will clear all the data
> > that's on the form page, even though the form is set up for a compound
> > property model..
> >
> > Is there any way to set the webmarkupcontainers visible to false using
> > ajax in Deployment mode?
>

Reply via email to