My current hosting is not very expensive and it was working OK for quite a long time. But recently I have got complaints from users about down times. Right now server has been down for a day and their support team has failed to give me a proper answer/fix. They already claimed everything was fixed and asked me to re-install everything, which was annoying/disappointing, just to discover, a few minutes ago, that old problem still remains. I'm willing to pay a "bit" more and have satisfied customers.
Thanks! On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Jesus Mireles <toxi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been using myhosting.com. I'm not going to claim they are the > greatest, but I havent had problems with uptime, speed or price. I stick > to custom VPS. > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Brown, Berlin [PRI-1PP] < > berlin.br...@primerica.com> wrote: > > > It is a little pricey. But I prefer linode for virtual hosting. And > they > > have good docs on tomcat configuration > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 9:55 AM > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > Subject: Re: OT: good java hosting > > > > Dank je wel! > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Matthijs <li...@selckin.be> > wrote: > > > > > hetzner.de > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Danje wel, > > > > > > > > Bijvoorbeeld? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Thomas Matthijs <li...@selckin.be> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > > > > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Apologies for the OT message... but I value the opinion of > > > > > > people in > > > > this > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you suggest a good place to host Wicket applications? I'm > > > hosting a > > > > > > couple of them somewhere I'm NOT very satisfied with service > > > provided. > > > > > > > > > > > > I started to compare offers myself... but a bit of help on that > > > > direction > > > > > > will be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1- Applications are not very resource/traffic intensive. > > > > > > > > > > > 2- Quality of support/up time should be good. > > > > > > > > > > > 3- Just need any relational database. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A cheapish dedicated server might be ideal for this, (and way > > > > > cheaper > > > > then > > > > > anything that even hits at cloud) > > > > > For 50eur/month you can have 32gb ram quad core i7s > > > > > > > > > > mvg, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro