It seems working now.
But such removal also make theme-switching not working :

If I enable the ThemeProvider :

    final ThemeProvider themeProvider = new
BootswatchThemeProvider(BootswatchTheme.Flatly);

settings.setJsResourceFilterName("footer-container").setThemeProvider(themeProvider);

without "footer-container" in the BasePage

wicket-bootstrap will throw

WicketRuntimeException: theme does not exists: bootstrap

at
de.agilecoders.wicket.themes.settings.BootswatchThemeProvider.byName(BootswatchThemeProvider.java:49)


So I could only use the native bootstrap theme now.




2014-07-06 11:30 GMT+08:00 smallufo <small...@gmail.com>:

> I found where goes wrong ,
> it's RenderJavaScriptToFooterHeaderResponseDecorator that causes the
> problem.
>
> I am not familiar with wicket-bootstrap , so I mimicked wicket-bootstrap
> sample's architecture :
>
> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/tree/master/bootstrap-samples/src/main/java/de/agilecoders/wicket/samples
>
> This is my 'not' working architecture :
> http://pastebin.com/vB3Ek2t9
>
> After removing RenderJavaScriptToFooterHeaderResponseDecorator ,
> footer-container , it works fine.
>
> http://pastebin.com/kAehvaRr
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-07-05 21:10 GMT+08:00 Francois Meillet <francois.meil...@gmail.com>:
>
> Run your app in debug mode and set some breakpoint.
>>
>> eclipse
>>
>> http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/debugging-with-intellij.html
>> http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/EclipseDebugging/article.html
>>
>> http://help.eclipse.org/juno/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.jdt.doc.user%2Freference%2Fpreferences%2Frun-debug%2Fref-run_debug.htm
>>
>> intellij
>> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/webhelp/run-debug-configurations.html
>>
>> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/webhelp/creating-and-editing-run-debug-configurations.html
>>
>> François Meillet
>> Formation Wicket - Développement Wicket
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 5 juil. 2014 à 14:56, smallufo <small...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> > 2014-07-05 20:55 GMT+08:00 smallufo <small...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> But i still find another "id6c" or "id6d"  in the source code.
>> >>
>> >
>> > sorry typo :
>> >
>> > But i still *cannot* find another "id6c" or "id6d"  in the source code.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to