http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-274
apparently it is not supported for now

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Cool!
>
> I'll see whether it is possible to filter out log4j.properties with
> maven-archetype-plugin and if it is then I'll update the quickstart
> generator.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I've removed all log4.properties files and... it's working! :)
>> Thanks a million for your help! I am sure this will prevent some attacks
>> of
>> nerves when users will redeploy their wicket apps from JBoss7 to
>> WildFly8..
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sebastien.
>>
>> PS: Stefan & David, thanks for your help too! :)
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have also removed log4j.jar from WEB-INF/lib. Maybe it is related too
>> but
>> > the logs appeared after removing log4j.properties
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Martin,
>> > >
>> > > I tried but I should have missed one because it was not working with
>> my
>> > > ear, I will test it again on Monday, but anyway you probably saved my
>> > > week-end! ;)
>> > > I also tried with a simple wicket quickstart and of course, it did not
>> > work
>> > > because of the properties file. So there will be another question :
>> how
>> > > will/can you handle the quickstart for this particular situation?
>> > >
>> >
>> > JEE has never been portable, no matter what JEE big players claim :-)
>> > We can add yet another drop-down in the quickstart generator form that
>> adds
>> > an additional -D (system property) or -P (Maven profile) which can be
>> used
>> > by maven-archetype-plugin to filter out the problematic files ?! I
>> haven't
>> > played with maven-archetype-plugin since a while but I guess it should
>> be
>> > possible.
>> > First tell us what fixes your problem :-)
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to