http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-274 apparently it is not supported for now
Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > Cool! > > I'll see whether it is possible to filter out log4j.properties with > maven-archetype-plugin and if it is then I'll update the quickstart > generator. > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Martin, >> >> I've removed all log4.properties files and... it's working! :) >> Thanks a million for your help! I am sure this will prevent some attacks >> of >> nerves when users will redeploy their wicket apps from JBoss7 to >> WildFly8.. >> >> Best regards, >> Sebastien. >> >> PS: Stefan & David, thanks for your help too! :) >> >> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > I have also removed log4j.jar from WEB-INF/lib. Maybe it is related too >> but >> > the logs appeared after removing log4j.properties >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Martin, >> > > >> > > I tried but I should have missed one because it was not working with >> my >> > > ear, I will test it again on Monday, but anyway you probably saved my >> > > week-end! ;) >> > > I also tried with a simple wicket quickstart and of course, it did not >> > work >> > > because of the properties file. So there will be another question : >> how >> > > will/can you handle the quickstart for this particular situation? >> > > >> > >> > JEE has never been portable, no matter what JEE big players claim :-) >> > We can add yet another drop-down in the quickstart generator form that >> adds >> > an additional -D (system property) or -P (Maven profile) which can be >> used >> > by maven-archetype-plugin to filter out the problematic files ?! I >> haven't >> > played with maven-archetype-plugin since a while but I guess it should >> be >> > possible. >> > First tell us what fixes your problem :-) >> > >> > >> > >
