Thanks! Whose PortletLike on
https://github.com/martin-g/component-rendering-default/blob/master/src/main/java/com/mycompany/HomePage.java?
PanelA?

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Here is a demo app with Wicket 6.x:
> https://github.com/martin-g/component-rendering-default
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Here is a possible solution *now*:
> >
> > portletLike.add(new AbstractTransformerBehavior() {
> >   @Override public CharSequence transform(Component c, CharSequence
> > output) {
> >      try {
> >        c.internalRenderComponent();
> >      } catch (Exception x) {
> >        return "default result";
> >      }
> >    }
> > });
> >
> > Something like this should do it.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I see... you may have already streamed content --> Maybe same interface
> >> serves to mark a component as "do not stream anything till the end", or
> >> stream the contents to an intermediate buffer... but what I way above
> >> might
> >> not make sense as well.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > @Martin,
> >> > >
> >> > > Just a (maybe stupid) idea:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1- Mark some component as ISafeFail
> >> > > 2- If rendering fails take Component_onfail.html and render it
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > As I said earlier this is not so trivial.
> >> > The failure may happen in the middle of the rendering and the content
> >> > collected so far in RequestCycle#getResponse() could be invalid HTML.
> >> > Appending anything (loaded from a file or generated on the fly) is not
> >> > really a solution.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4321
> >> > > > this is the ticker I meant
> >> > > > it suggests to restart the rendering completely for the whole page
> >> and
> >> > > this
> >> > > > is not enough
> >> > > > I'll see what kind of changes would be needed to accomplish this.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Martin Grigorov
> >> > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> [email protected]
> >> > >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > There is no support for this, even in 7.x.
> >> > > > > I remember Carl-Eric Menzel asking for the same functionality
> >> before
> >> > > ...
> >> > > > > Behavior#onException() sounds like something similar but there
> is
> >> no
> >> > > way
> >> > > > > to suppress the bubbling of the exception at the moment.
> >> > > > > The bigger problem is that the rendering can fail in the middle,
> >> i.e.
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > component can have written some response already and then fail.
> If
> >> > the
> >> > > > > written response is proper HTML then it is OKish. But if some
> tag
> >> is
> >> > > not
> >> > > > > closed then the rendering of the complete page may fail.
> >> > > > > So if we try to add this functionality we will have to use
> >> temporary
> >> > > > > Response objects for the rendering of each component to be able
> to
> >> > > throw
> >> > > > > away whatever it has produced before failing.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Usually the problem is related to the component's model. A
> >> workaround
> >> > > for
> >> > > > > you could be to use a wrapper Model that returns "empty data"
> when
> >> > the
> >> > > > > underlying model throws an exception.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> >> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Hi,
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Tobias Gierke <
> >> > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> > Hi,
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >> Wouldn't it be possible to "embed"  the failing prone
> porlets
> >> > > inside
> >> > > > >> >> iframes so that each one is a Wicket page?
> >> > > > >> >>
> >> > > > >> > I already thought about this but the page uses quite a lot of
> >> > fancy
> >> > > > >> > CSS/Ajax/Javascript (portlets are rendered in a grid with
> >> > > configurable
> >> > > > >> > row/column count, drag'n'drop to move them around etc.) and
> I'd
> >> > > rather
> >> > > > >> not
> >> > > > >> > touch the existing code if there's a Java-side only solution
> >> ;-)
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> I do not know of any :-(
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Another possibility is build each client entirely on JavaScript
> >> and
> >> > > use
> >> > > > >> Wicket just as a service layer... not very Wicket like but you
> >> would
> >> > > not
> >> > > > >> have this problem.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > Cheers,
> >> > > > >> > Tobias
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Tobias Gierke <
> >> > > > >> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >> >>
> >> > > > >> >>  Hi,
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> In our web application we have a dashboard-like homepage
> that
> >> > > > >> displays a
> >> > > > >> >>> number of user-configurable 'portlets' (which are really
> just
> >> > > > ordinary
> >> > > > >> >>> Wicket components and have nothing to do with the Portlet
> >> spec).
> >> > > I'm
> >> > > > >> >>> looking for a way of preventing the application from
> becoming
> >> > > > >> unusable in
> >> > > > >> >>> case one or more of these portlets continuously fail to
> >> render
> >> > > > >> because of
> >> > > > >> >>> some internal error/bug.
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> We're currently using a custom RequestCycleListener with
> the
> >> > > > >> >>> onException()
> >> > > > >> >>> method redirecting to a generic error page, thus when
> >> rendering
> >> > > of a
> >> > > > >> >>> 'portlet' fails the user will never get to see the homepage
> >> and
> >> > > > always
> >> > > > >> >>> end
> >> > > > >> >>> up on the error page - which is obviously not really
> >> desirable.
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> Is there a way to to hook into Wicket's rendering cycle so
> >> that
> >> > I
> >> > > > can
> >> > > > >> >>> provide some default markup in case rendering of a
> component
> >> > > > (subtree)
> >> > > > >> >>> fails with a RuntimeException ?
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> I understand that this maybe be very tricky since the
> >> component
> >> > > > >> subtree
> >> > > > >> >>> might've rendered partially and thus internal state will be
> >> > > > >> inconsistent.
> >> > > > >> >>> It would probably require serializing the initial state of
> >> the
> >> > > > >> component
> >> > > > >> >>> (subtree) before rendering starts and reverting the wholle
> >> > subtree
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > >> its
> >> > > > >> >>> initial state once a RuntimeException is thrown.
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> We're running Wicket 1.5.12.
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >> > > > >> >>> Tobias
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> --
> >> > > > >> >>> Tobias Gierke
> >> > > > >> >>> Development
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> VOIPFUTURE GmbH   Wendenstraße 4   20097 Hamburg,  Germany
> >> > > > >> >>> Phone +49 40 688 900 164 Fax +49 40 688 900 199
> >> > > > >> >>> Email [email protected]   Web
> >> > > http://www.voipfuture.com
> >> > > > >> >>>   CEO Jan Bastian
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>> Commercial Court AG Hamburg   HRB 109896, VAT ID
> DE263738086
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> >> > > > >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> [email protected]
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>>
> >> > > > >> >>
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> --
> >> > > > >> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Reply via email to