The url seems to work now!
Clicking deactivate sets the property to null.
Please confirm that it works as expected.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Christopher Merrill <
ch...@webperformance.com> wrote:

> I added the getSession().setAttribute() into the page constructor. When I
> hit the page, I see two lines in the AppEngine logs. The first is for the
> URL I put in the browser (/portal/pages/Test), which indicates a 302
> response to the browser and the log entry also contains the debug message
> that I included along with the setAttribute() line.
>
> The next line in the logs is for URL /portal/pages/Test?1 and is a 200
> response with the page content.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Chris
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Christopher Merrill <
> ch...@webperformance.com> wrote:
>
> > I added that line, along with
> >   Debug.log.out("the test attribute is: " +
> > getSession().getAttribute("test"));
> > in the onSubmit() method of the AjaxButton.
> >
> > If I DO NOT refresh the page before pressing the button, then it prints
> > the message with the date in the logs.
> >
> > If I do refresh the page, nothing...which I take to mean that the code
> > never runs.
> >
> > I'll try it in the constructor for the page.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> OK, then also put the same line in some constructor that is invoked.
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Christopher Merrill <
> >> ch...@webperformance.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'll do that. It'll take a few minutes to deploy that back up to
> >> AppEngine.
> >> >
> >> > But I don't think that code will be executed - I feel pretty confident
> >> that
> >> > the event listeners are not being invoked. At least, my debug
> >> statements in
> >> > the event listener do not get into the AppEngine logs.
> >> >
> >> > Chris
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Can you try something else:
> >> > > in onClick() add code like: getSession.setAttribute("test", new
> >> Date())
> >> > >
> >> > > Martin Grigorov
> >> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Christopher Merrill <
> >> > > ch...@webperformance.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Thanks for your help, Martin!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I turned off page recreation by adding:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > getPageSettings().setRecreateMountedPagesAfterExpiry(false);
> >> > > >
> >> > > > to my Application.init() method.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > There is no change in the behavior, either locally or in AppEngine
> >> --
> >> > > i.e.
> >> > > > no page expired errors.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > You can observe the behavior here:
> >> > > > http://1.wp-portal-staging.appspot.com/portal/pages/Test
> >> > > >
> >> > > > by visiting the page, refreshing it and then pressing a button
> >> (which
> >> > > will
> >> > > > do nothing if you refreshed). I posted the code for that page in
> >> > another
> >> > > > thread ("Model value change lost between AjaxButton.onSubmit() and
> >> > > > form.onSubmit()"), in case that helps.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > TIA!
> >> > > > Chris
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > My guess is that there is some problem with the saving of the
> >> page in
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > backing stores.
> >> > > > > Try by disabling page recreation for expired pages, see
> >> > IPageSettings,
> >> > > > > If I'm right then you should start seeing PageExpiredPage after
> >> > > clicking
> >> > > > > the link.
> >> > > > > The next step is will be to find why the pages could not be
> >> stored.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> >> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Christopher Merrill <
> >> > > > > ch...@webperformance.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > I'm seeing problems throughout our app where refreshing the
> page
> >> > > causes
> >> > > > > > other event listeners to then malfunction. These are trivially
> >> > simple
> >> > > > > > listeners, like:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Link customer_link = new Link("org_link")
> >> > > > > >     {
> >> > > > > >     @Override
> >> > > > > >     public void onClick()
> >> > > > > >         {
> >> > > > > >         setResponsePage(new
> >> > > > > > OrganizationAdministrationPage(getPageReference(),
> >> > > > > > _organization_key));
> >> > > > > >         }
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >     private static final long serialVersionUID =
> >> > > -6396556709778260098L;
> >> > > > > >     };
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Instead of returning the response page, the browser receives a
> >> > > forward
> >> > > > > > (302) back to the same page instance...which of course means
> >> that
> >> > the
> >> > > > > link
> >> > > > > > appears to do nothing.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I can only reproduce this behavior when the app is deployed to
> >> > > > AppEngine
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > > it works fine running on my desktop. The problems started when
> >> we
> >> > > > > upgraded
> >> > > > > > the application to Wicket 6. I'm not implying this is a
> Wicket 6
> >> > > > > > problem...in fact I assume we have done something that is
> >> causing
> >> > > this
> >> > > > > > malfunction. But since it worked under Wicket 5, I'm hoping
> >> someone
> >> > > > will
> >> > > > > > see a relationship between the symptoms and a change that we
> >> need
> >> > to
> >> > > > make
> >> > > > > > for compatibility with Wicket 6.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Any hints or debugging ideas (since I can't step through the
> >> code
> >> > > > running
> >> > > > > > in AppEngine) would be greatly appreciated!
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Chris
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to