`mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the core module:
[INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [ > 0.353 s] > [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ............................... SUCCESS [ > 2.673 s] > [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE [ > 0.023 s] > [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s > [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00 > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could not > resolve dependencies for project > org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find > org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in the > local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update > interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced -> > [Help 1] > [ERROR] Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <emond.papega...@topicus.nl > wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on 8.0-SNAPSHOT. I > did > not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your > tests > on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local repo > also. > > Best regards, > Emond > > On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote: > > Hi Emond, > > > > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to build > > from source and push to my local artifact repo? > > > > Best, > > > > Thomas > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij < > emond.papega...@topicus.nl> > > wrote: > > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all > > > deprecated > > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and > > > refactoring. > > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo > runs > > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Emond > > > > > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote: > > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week. We > > > > are > > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also depend > on > > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly > dead. > > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy > JavaScript > > > > > > ui > > > > > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the > > > > > > latest > > > > > > > version :) > > > > > > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that > when > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API > > > > > > might > > > > > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Emond Papegaaij > > > > > > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <tho...@umschalt.com>: > > > > > Hi Ernesto, > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my > > > > > > project > > > > > > > > heavily depends on it. > > > > > > > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 ( > > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of > 8.0.0 > > > > > would > > > > > be enough for me. > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > > > > > > > > > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to > > > > > > contribute to > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages.. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl < > tho...@umschalt.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, > could > > > > > > > > > > > > somebody > > > > > > > > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new > version? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't > move > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > Wicket > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 without it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
