The culprit is: https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868b940d9be3a
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <tho...@umschalt.com> wrote: > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the core > module: > > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [ >> 0.353 s] >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ............................... SUCCESS [ >> 2.673 s] >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE [ >> 0.023 s] >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------ >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------ >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00 >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------ >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could not >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery: >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced -> >> [Help 1] >> [ERROR] > > > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file. > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij < > emond.papega...@topicus.nl> wrote: > >> Hi Thomas, >> >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on 8.0-SNAPSHOT. >> I did >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your >> tests >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local >> repo >> also. >> >> Best regards, >> Emond >> >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote: >> > Hi Emond, >> > >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to >> build >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo? >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Thomas >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij < >> emond.papega...@topicus.nl> >> > wrote: >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all >> > > deprecated >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and >> > > refactoring. >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo >> runs >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components. >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > Emond >> > > >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote: >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week. >> We >> > > > are >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also >> depend on >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly >> dead. >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy >> JavaScript >> > > >> > > ui >> > > >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the >> > > >> > > latest >> > > >> > > > version :) >> > > > >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that >> when >> > > >> > > I'm >> > > >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API >> > > >> > > might >> > > >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release. >> > > > >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Emond Papegaaij >> > > > >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <tho...@umschalt.com>: >> > > > > Hi Ernesto, >> > > > > >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my >> > > >> > > project >> > > >> > > > > heavily depends on it. >> > > > > >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 ( >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of >> 8.0.0 >> > > > > would >> > > > > be enough for me. >> > > > > >> > > > > Best, >> > > > > >> > > > > Thomas >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < >> > > > > >> > > > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to >> > > >> > > contribute to >> > > >> > > > > it >> > > > > >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages.. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl < >> tho...@umschalt.com> >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, >> could >> > > > > > >> > > > > > somebody >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new >> version? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't >> move >> > > >> > > to >> > > >> > > > > > Wicket >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 8 without it. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Best, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thomas >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >
