+1 non binding. I was going to write asking for a M3 release right now :-) On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:
> In that case I vote to release 9.0.0 with the next releases of 7.x and 8.x, > no need to wait until Q3. > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:43 AM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I haven't had time to work an wicket-ajax-no-jquery.js, and I agree that > > we as well might try that in Wicket 10. > > > > Meanwhile I'm preparing a pull request for another modal-dialog > > proposal, but this doesn't have to delay a Wicket 9 release either. > > > > Have fun > > Sven > > > > > > On 20.06.19 11:50, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The only bigger task I am aware of is the vanilla wicket-ajax.js > rewrite > > > that has been suggested by Korbinian Bachl (some time ago) and Andrew > > > Kondratev (more recently). Sven said that he wants to work on it. > > > But in my opinion this task should not stop us to release 9.0.0. The > > > vanilla impl can be introduced in a minor release too, even in 8.x, if > > the > > > APIs are preserved. > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:03 AM Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm happy you started to appreciate Wicket 9.x in its earliest > versions! > > >> The short answer is no, there is no estimated time for 9.x to become > EA. > > >> But at the moment I'm not aware of any huge feature or refactoring > being > > >> in progress or even proposed. Let's hear what other developers have to > > >> say about this. > > >> Personally speaking I'm also willing to release Wicket 9.x in a short > > >> time, let's say in the Q4 of this year, after one or two more > milestone > > >> releases. I also believe that the time is now ripe to provide a > version > > >> of Wicket for the "post Java 8 era", which fully supports the last LTS > > JDK. > > >> > > >> Andrea. > > >> > > >> On 6/19/19 12:29 PM, rstolle wrote: > > >>> Same here! I would love to go with wicket 9 ASAP. I'm using 9.0.0-M2 > > >>> on a new > > >>> project and very much appreciate the switch to java.time.Duration, > > >>> which saves > > >>> me a lot of conversions. Junit5 is also a huge plus in my opinion. So > > >>> far I did not > > >>> encounter any problems. > > >>> > > >>> Good moment to THANK THE WICKET TEAM (again) - you doing a wicked > job! > > >>> > > >>> René > > >>> > > >>> Am 2019-06-19 11:30 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro: > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> Is there an estimated time for 9.x official release? My question is > > not > > >>>> just moot: I'm keeping a parallel version of our project based on > > wicket > > >>>> 9.x. branch, and some problems I encountered on wicket 8.x. are > > >>>> easier to > > >>>> solve on 9.x. So, if release is not too far in the future I might > try > > to > > >>>> convince other team members to go 9.x. for development. > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > >>> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
