Also +1 :)

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 13:01 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <reier...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 non binding. I was going to write asking for a M3 release right now :-)
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > In that case I vote to release 9.0.0 with the next releases of 7.x and
> 8.x,
> > no need to wait until Q3.
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:43 AM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I haven't had time to work an wicket-ajax-no-jquery.js, and I agree
> that
> > > we as well might try that in Wicket 10.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile I'm preparing a pull request for another modal-dialog
> > > proposal, but this doesn't have to delay a Wicket 9 release either.
> > >
> > > Have fun
> > > Sven
> > >
> > >
> > > On 20.06.19 11:50, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The only bigger task I am aware of is the vanilla wicket-ajax.js
> > rewrite
> > > > that has been suggested by Korbinian Bachl (some time ago) and Andrew
> > > > Kondratev (more recently). Sven said that he wants to work on it.
> > > > But in my opinion this task should not stop us to release 9.0.0. The
> > > > vanilla impl can be introduced in a minor release too, even in 8.x,
> if
> > > the
> > > > APIs are preserved.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:03 AM Andrea Del Bene <
> an.delb...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm happy you started to appreciate Wicket 9.x in its earliest
> > versions!
> > > >> The short answer is no, there is no estimated time for 9.x to become
> > EA.
> > > >> But at the moment I'm not aware of any huge feature or refactoring
> > being
> > > >> in progress or even proposed. Let's hear what other developers have
> to
> > > >> say about this.
> > > >> Personally speaking I'm also willing to release Wicket 9.x in a
> short
> > > >> time, let's say in the Q4 of this year, after one or two more
> > milestone
> > > >> releases. I also believe that the time is now ripe to provide a
> > version
> > > >> of Wicket for the "post Java 8 era", which fully supports the last
> LTS
> > > JDK.
> > > >>
> > > >> Andrea.
> > > >>
> > > >> On 6/19/19 12:29 PM, rstolle wrote:
> > > >>> Same here! I would love to go with wicket 9 ASAP. I'm using
> 9.0.0-M2
> > > >>> on a new
> > > >>> project and very much appreciate the switch to java.time.Duration,
> > > >>> which saves
> > > >>> me a lot of conversions. Junit5 is also a huge plus in my opinion.
> So
> > > >>> far I did not
> > > >>> encounter any problems.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Good moment to THANK THE WICKET TEAM (again) - you doing a wicked
> > job!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> René
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Am 2019-06-19 11:30 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro:
> > > >>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Is there an estimated time for 9.x official release? My question
> is
> > > not
> > > >>>> just moot: I'm keeping a parallel version of our project based on
> > > wicket
> > > >>>> 9.x. branch, and some problems I encountered on wicket 8.x. are
> > > >>>> easier to
> > > >>>> solve on 9.x. So, if release is not too far in the future I might
> > try
> > > to
> > > >>>> convince other team members to go 9.x. for development.
> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>

Reply via email to