Thanks for the reply, Thomas! Looking forward to the new form support :-) On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 17:03, Lewis Denizen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi xwiki-users, > > > > When attempting to include an inline form in XWiki Syntax 2.0, the > resulting > > page always gets wrapped in a {pre} tag. It says this was to prevent > > further rendering of the form, but this doesn't work too well with the > 2.0 > > syntax since {pre} is not a valid tag (just renders it as a literal > string). > > > > I just created a custom form (using the {{html}} tag), but what is the > > preferred way of creating inline forms using the 2.0 syntax? Is this ( > > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2891) the JIRA that tracks this > > issue? > > > > Also, I'm not 100% certain, but it also seems that a "#includeForm(" > needs > > to exist in order for the default "edit" mode to enter inline editing (I > > think viewheader.vm is used to render the top panel... and there's a > check > > [#if($doc.content.indexOf("includeForm(")!=-1)], which probably detects > > this) - again, will this still hold true in the 2.0 syntax? > > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2891 is more about find a way > to choose the right editor event without the #includeForm > > I'm currently working on the general issue about display form fields > with 2.0 doc in template, 2.0 doc in 2.0 content, etc. for > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3364 it will be fixed today > for 1.8RC3 > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > -- Lewis > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
