On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 23:09, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I think this initiative is great and will help improved our UX. > > The paper cut issues could be great for anyone wanting to start > > participating in open source and want a small bug to fix (like GSOC > > students > > :p ) > > > > Related jira issues could be just linked to this jira task. > >> > > > > Instead of linking them we could tag them with paperCut, maybe we > > like this > > approach better. > > > > User could tag the issues with paperCut and developers should rate the > > issue's difficulty and priority. > > I don't see the difference between a "papercut" tag and the "trivial" > difficulty. Could you explain? > > The idea is that if it's a user submitted issue, the user might not know the difficulty of the issue and he will just mark it with the tag. If the developer comes and marks it difficult, we still know that the user though that the issue needed attention and raises an usability problem. > > Regarding > > > >> Trivial: > >> > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10534 > >> > > we are targeting just the issues in the CORE? there are lots of > > trivial > > issues in other components. > > See my previous mail. I mentioned the need to have the difficulty > custom field in other jira projects too... > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
