The "original" Ubuntu paper cut definition > Put briefly, *a paper cut is* *a trivially fixable usability bug that the > average user would encounter on his/her first day of using a brand new > installation of Ubuntu Desktop Edition* >
so the papercut is so much trivial than it is an usability bug. How can he tag with papercut if he doesn't know if it's a trivial > issue (since the definition of a paper cut is that it's a trivial > issue)! :) > > > If the > > developer comes and marks it difficult, we still know that the user > > though > > that the issue needed attention and raises an usability problem. > > I don't think papercut == usability issue. For usability issues we > should tag them with "usability" IMO since the need is more general > than just for papercuts. > > Thanks > -Vincent > IMO if we want to make this initiative an user reporting process, it's easier and more intuitive to mark the reported issues with a tag that states the paperCut concept, than to mark it with a difficulty level. _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
