On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 14:30, Raluca Stavro <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hello, > > +0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it > +0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16 > +0.1 to start all over > > What do you think about this: > > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation-engineering.png > ? > > Raluca. > The variation is very nice and subtle :P > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Community, > > > > The search for the XWiki.org logo isn't over yet... > > > > The second round of votes finished, with the following results: > > > > +9 for 4 > > +4 for 12 (I counted Thibaut's +1 for 12A as a +1 for 12) > > +1 for 15 > > +14 for 16 > > +1 for 19 > > > > Normally, 16 would be the winner, but since several key members of the > > community objected to it, I see three ways to proceed: > > > > 1. Declare 16 as the elected logo, but further improve it to soften the > > objections > > 2. Start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16 > > 3. Slow down a bit, since there's no hard deadline to meet, and start > > all over, accepting new proposals > > > > I for one would go for option 1, if Vincent, Ludovic, Guillaume, Fabio > > agree. > > > > On 04/08/2010 06:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > >> Hello XWiki Community, > >> > >> We're still looking for the new XWiki.org logo. First of all, many > >> thanks to all those who submitted their ideas ( > >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallenge ). After the > >> first round of votes (digest here: > >> > http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ah6DqXzfHT2vdHV5Ty1LX3lKU3U5V3M4YmNFSXEzcVE&hl=en > ), > >> > >> we chose 6 "popular" proposals for the second round: > >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 . > >> > >> The authors of these proposals were asked to do the following, if not > >> already done for round 1: > >> * try to integrate any constructive feedback that came with the > >> votes (a digest of the feedback from the emails is available for each > >> proposal on > >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 ) > >> * polish the design (if they consider it necessary) > >> * provide the requested variations for .org, enterprise and office > >> * provide samples for light and dark background > >> * provide a black&white version > >> * provide a 16X16 icon containing the logo or a representative part > >> of the logo > >> * provide a nice "Powered by XWiki" button that goes with the logo > >> * provide a mockup/screenshot with the logo used in the current > >> skin, colibri > >> > >> For most of the finalist logos, the _final_ versions were already > >> uploaded here: > >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 . > >> For those who were not updated, we will use the initial submissions > >> for round 2 as well, > >> and voters will have to use their imagination in case > >> any of the required use cases is missing. > >> > >> > >> VOTING: > >> > >> You can send your vote on the mailing list ([email protected] or > >> [email protected]), in reply to this email. No twitter votes this time. > >> > >> Each voter can grant a whole +1 to only one of the 6 finalists > >> ( > >> > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2#HFinalistproposals > >> ). > >> > >> IMPORTANT: Before choosing a logo based on your personal preference, > >> please try to also ask yourself the following questions: > >> > >> * Is it distinctive? Note that it should not resemble other logos, > >> including the XWiki SAS/xwiki.com logo. > >> * Is it easy to remember and recognize? > >> * Does it blend in smoothly with the Colibri skin? With the new > >> XWiki.org skin? Note that adjustments to the skin is possible, in order > >> to better integrate with the logo. > >> * Is the design scalable? Could it (or parts of it) be > >> successfully used in a 16X16 icon? Would it look good on a very large > >> poster? > >> * Can it be used (as it is, or adapted) on both light and dark > backgrounds? > >> * What would it look like in black and white (not just grayscale)? > >> It's ok if some details are lost, but it needs to still look > >> attractive and keep the main features. > >> > >> > >> TIMELINE: > >> > >> 08/Apr/10 : Beginning of second round of votes on [email protected], > >> [email protected] > >> 11/Apr/10 : End of votes > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > Sergiu Dumitriu > > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
