On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:30, Raluca Stavro <raluca.moro...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> +0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it
>> +0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
>> +0.1 to start all over
>> 
>> What do you think about this:
>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation-engineering.png
>> ?
> 
> I like this one, i voted for
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/LogoChallenge#HProposal8RalucaStavro
> after all ;)

I also find it better.

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
>> 
>> Raluca.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <ser...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Community,
>>> 
>>> The search for the XWiki.org logo isn't over yet...
>>> 
>>> The second round of votes finished, with the following results:
>>> 
>>> +9 for 4
>>> +4 for 12 (I counted Thibaut's +1 for 12A as a +1 for 12)
>>> +1 for 15
>>> +14 for 16
>>> +1 for 19
>>> 
>>> Normally, 16 would be the winner, but since several key members of the
>>> community objected to it, I see three ways to proceed:
>>> 
>>> 1. Declare 16 as the elected logo, but further improve it to soften the
>>> objections
>>> 2. Start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
>>> 3. Slow down a bit, since there's no hard deadline to meet, and start
>>> all over, accepting new proposals
>>> 
>>> I for one would go for option 1, if Vincent, Ludovic, Guillaume, Fabio
>>> agree.
>>> 
>>> On 04/08/2010 06:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>>> Hello XWiki Community,
>>>> 
>>>> We're still looking for the new XWiki.org logo. First of all, many
>>>> thanks to all those who submitted their ideas (
>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallenge ). After the
>>>> first round of votes (digest here:
>>>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ah6DqXzfHT2vdHV5Ty1LX3lKU3U5V3M4YmNFSXEzcVE&hl=en),
>>>> 
>>>> we chose 6 "popular" proposals for the second round:
>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 .
>>>> 
>>>> The authors of these proposals were asked to do the following, if not
>>>> already done for round 1:
>>>> * try to integrate any constructive feedback that came with the
>>>> votes (a digest of the feedback from the emails is available for each
>>>> proposal on
>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 )
>>>> * polish the design (if they consider it necessary)
>>>> * provide the requested variations for .org, enterprise and office
>>>> * provide samples for light and dark background
>>>> * provide a black&white version
>>>> * provide a 16X16 icon containing the logo or a representative part
>>>> of the logo
>>>> * provide a nice "Powered by XWiki" button that goes with the logo
>>>> * provide a mockup/screenshot with the logo used in the current
>>>> skin, colibri
>>>> 
>>>> For most of the finalist logos, the _final_ versions were already
>>>> uploaded here:
>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 .
>>>> For those who were not updated, we will use the initial submissions
>>>> for round 2 as well,
>>>> and voters will have to use their imagination in case
>>>> any of the required use cases is missing.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> VOTING:
>>>> 
>>>> You can send your vote on the mailing list (d...@xwiki.org or
>>>> users@xwiki.org), in reply to this email. No twitter votes this time.
>>>> 
>>>> Each voter can grant a whole +1 to only one of the 6 finalists
>>>> (
>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2#HFinalistproposals
>>>> ).
>>>> 
>>>> IMPORTANT: Before choosing a logo based on your personal preference,
>>>> please try to also ask yourself the following questions:
>>>> 
>>>> * Is it distinctive? Note that it should not resemble other logos,
>>>> including the XWiki SAS/xwiki.com logo.
>>>> * Is it easy to remember and recognize?
>>>> * Does it blend in smoothly with the Colibri skin? With the new
>>>> XWiki.org skin? Note that adjustments to the skin is possible, in order
>>>> to better integrate with the logo.
>>>> * Is the design scalable? Could it (or parts of it) be
>>>> successfully used in a 16X16 icon? Would it look good on a very large
>>>> poster?
>>>> * Can it be used (as it is, or adapted) on both light and dark backgrounds?
>>>> * What would it look like in black and white (not just grayscale)?
>>>> It's ok if some details are lost, but it needs to still look
>>>> attractive and keep the main features.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> TIMELINE:
>>>> 
>>>> 08/Apr/10 : Beginning of second round of votes on d...@xwiki.org,
>>>> users@xwiki.org
>>>> 11/Apr/10 : End of votes
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to