In my case I am using the default value in xwiki.cfg:

xwiki.work.dir=data

This seems to be pointing to /home/<tomcat user>/data on my system.

Looks like the Lucene index is in /home/<tomcat user>/data/lucene ... hmm.
I deleted a different directory before.  Anyway... yes, the user has access
to this directory.

-bash-3.2$ ll data
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 3 tomcat60 tomcat60 4096 Feb 22 06:24 extension
drwxr-xr-x 2 tomcat60 tomcat60 4096 Feb 28 18:00 lucene
-bash-3.2$ ll data/lucene
total 1548
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60 638394 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.fdt
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60   3404 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.fdx
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60  11929 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.fnm
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60 125852 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.frq
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60 141104 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.nrm
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60 248013 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.prx
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60   5082 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.tii
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60 369203 Feb 28 18:00 _f4.tis
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60    280 Feb 28 18:00 segments_7m
-rw-r--r-- 1 tomcat60 tomcat60     20 Feb 28 18:00 segments.gen

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Guillaume Fenollar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> When the page "stucks", it's often because of a write issue on xwiki work
> directory. Are you sure you put a static value of xwiki.work.dir in
> xwiki.cfg file after your upgrade? Your application server must have the
> right to write in there.
>
>
> 2012/2/28 Joshua Davis <[email protected]>
>
> > Interesting.   Is there some way to tell the Lucene not to index the
> > attachments?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:39 PM, <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Joshua,
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > > Joshua Davis [[email protected]]
> > > > Sent: 28 February 2012 21:30
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: [xwiki-users] Lucene re-index problem
> > > >
> > > > After upgrading to XWiki 3.5 (from 2.6) I noticed that the Lucene
> > search
> > > > index was not working properly.   On advice I got in the #xwiki IRC
> > > chat, I
> > > > shut down the server (Tomcat), deleted the Lucene index directory,
> and
> > > > restarted the server.   Only about 300 of the thousands of pages were
> > > > indexed at that point.    I tried re-indexing using the Admin->Search
> > > page,
> > > > but every time I do that the Admin->Search page gets 'stuck' (won't
> > > render).
> > > >
> > > > I saw no errors in the catalina.out log file, and I configured
> > > > WEB-INF/classes/logback.xml to enable some more logging to a separate
> > > > file... still nothing very informative.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas what I can do to troubleshoot this?   I'm guessing there's
> > some
> > > > page in my wiki database that is causing the re-index process to get
> > > stuck.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > >
> > > > - Josh
> > >
> > > Almost two years ago we face a similar problem while updating to XWiki
> > > Enterprise 2.4.30451. We have been not able to get Lucene working in
> this
> > > installation. The problem here seems related with Microsoft Office
> > > attachements. I don't remember exactly how do we reach this conclusion
> > and
> > > it could be a kind of "shot in the air", but I remember that PDF files
> > seem
> > > to index fine, but "xls" and "doc" files causes the failure of the
> > process.
> > > As in your case, Admin>Search won't render. We have never find a
> > solution.
> > > This installation is still running but we are using database search
> > instead.
> > >
> > > i keep following this thread!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Ricardo
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > > Nota: A informaci?n contida nesta mensaxe e os seus posibles documentos
> > > adxuntos ? privada e confidencial e est? dirixida ?nicamente ? seu
> > > destinatario/a. Se vostede non ? o/a destinatario/a orixinal desta
> > mensaxe,
> > > por favor elim?nea. A distribuci?n ou copia desta mensaxe non est?
> > > autorizada.
> > >
> > > Nota: La informaci?n contenida en este mensaje y sus posibles
> documentos
> > > adjuntos es privada y confidencial y est? dirigida ?nicamente a su
> > > destinatario/a. Si usted no es el/la destinatario/a original de este
> > > mensaje, por favor elim?nelo. La distribuci?n o copia de este mensaje
> no
> > > est? autorizada.
> > >
> > > See more languages: http://www.sergas.es/aviso_confidencialidad.htm
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Fenollar
> XWiki SysAdmin
> Tel : +33 (0)1.83.62.66.15
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to