Very good initiative!

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Andreea Popescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
> If you’re wondering what kept the QA team busy during the last few days,
> the answer is a lot of testing and a brainstorming effort in order to
> devise a series of statistics for the product, which would be featured with
> the product version 6.2.
>
>
> We believe that the statistics ought to be implemented for the following
> reasons:
>
> a) They would allow for better communication between us and the community
>
> b) Each version would be more easily evaluated this way
>
> c) The product’s evolution would be more easily observable by tracking the
> changes in these statistics from one version to another
>
> d) A more complete overview on the long-term evolution of the product
> would  be possible, with an opportunity to analyze a series of items in
> detail
>
>
> We consider some of the above-mentioned items to be quite important. Here
> is a list of the most important ones:
>
>    - No. of downloads
>    - No. of active installs
>    - No. of tests executed / added
>
>
>    - Jira issues fixed - by resolution, by priority, by type
>    - Jira issues opened - by  priority, by type
>    - Closed vs open tickets
>    - Stats for important tags: e.g. ie10, mobile, flamingo
>    - Stats for major features: e.g. flamingo, extension manager, solr
>
>
>    - Top overall issues reporters
>    - Top non-XWiki SAS issues reporters
>
>
>    - Extensions quality: issues reported (top 10 extensions)
>    - Extensions quality: issues closed (top 10 extensions)
>
>
>    - l10n translations: existent, missing
>
>
>    - Performance stats
>
> Therefore, your opinion on the following issues would be of great use to
> us:
>

> a) The list offered a number of items that we deem important for our
> measurements and assessments. We would like to know whether you agree with
> the list and we would like to have your opinion regarding other items that
> we would consider inserting in the list?

The list looks good.

>
> b) Where would you like us to publish the statistics and the conclusions
> that would result from their analysis? We were thinking about the following:
>
>
>    - On a ‘Project Health’ page
>    - On a page designated to each product version (each version would have
>    its own page with statistics)
>    - In the test.xwiki.org
>    - Within a blogpost
>    - A mix of the above

I'm not sure what is best but we need to be able to link the stats
from the release notes I think.

Thanks,
Marius

>
> We await your reply and feedback regarding the viability and usefulness of
> our proposal.
>
>
> Thank you for your time
>
> --
>
> Andreea Zenovia Popescu
>
> QA Engineer @XWiki SAS
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to