On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea <[email protected]> wrote: > Very good initiative! > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Andreea Popescu > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> >> If you’re wondering what kept the QA team busy during the last few days, >> the answer is a lot of testing and a brainstorming effort in order to >> devise a series of statistics for the product, which would be featured with >> the product version 6.2. >> >> >> We believe that the statistics ought to be implemented for the following >> reasons: >> >> a) They would allow for better communication between us and the community >> >> b) Each version would be more easily evaluated this way >> >> c) The product’s evolution would be more easily observable by tracking the >> changes in these statistics from one version to another >> >> d) A more complete overview on the long-term evolution of the product >> would be possible, with an opportunity to analyze a series of items in >> detail >> >> >> We consider some of the above-mentioned items to be quite important. Here >> is a list of the most important ones: >> >> - No. of downloads >> - No. of active installs >> - No. of tests executed / added >> >> >> - Jira issues fixed - by resolution, by priority, by type >> - Jira issues opened - by priority, by type >> - Closed vs open tickets >> - Stats for important tags: e.g. ie10, mobile, flamingo >> - Stats for major features: e.g. flamingo, extension manager, solr >> >> >> - Top overall issues reporters >> - Top non-XWiki SAS issues reporters >> >> >> - Extensions quality: issues reported (top 10 extensions) >> - Extensions quality: issues closed (top 10 extensions) >> >> >> - l10n translations: existent, missing >> >> >> - Performance stats >> >> Therefore, your opinion on the following issues would be of great use to >> us: >> > >> a) The list offered a number of items that we deem important for our >> measurements and assessments. We would like to know whether you agree with >> the list and we would like to have your opinion regarding other items that >> we would consider inserting in the list? > > The list looks good.
We could add: - l10n translations: contributions and contributors (this should be easy to get with a request) > >> >> b) Where would you like us to publish the statistics and the conclusions >> that would result from their analysis? We were thinking about the following: >> >> >> - On a ‘Project Health’ page >> - On a page designated to each product version (each version would have >> its own page with statistics) >> - In the test.xwiki.org >> - Within a blogpost >> - A mix of the above > > I'm not sure what is best but we need to be able to link the stats > from the release notes I think. +1 for the link in release note, also since those are the reference to get information about some version that could be the right place to store these statistics (or in a "subpage" like http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki62Statistics) I would say ‘Project Health’ is more the current status but it could link to versions dedicated pages. blogpost would be nice to announce it but I don't thing that where it should be stored. > > Thanks, > Marius > >> >> We await your reply and feedback regarding the viability and usefulness of >> our proposal. >> >> >> Thank you for your time >> >> -- >> >> Andreea Zenovia Popescu >> >> QA Engineer @XWiki SAS >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
