I started putting a PR together for ZEPPELIN-605. I might not be able to spend a lot of time on this for the rest of the week, but I should be able to devote more time early next week.
My initial goal is to have a default 2.10 build, and enable a 2.11 profile which would build a subset of interpreters that support 2.11, with emphasis on Spark, but gradually move to enable support on other interpreters. Thoughts ? On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:56 AM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > If we can support both 2.10 and 2.11 and gracefully dropping 2.10 support > for SparkInterpreter, that would be better. And I think it's totally fine > only portion of interpreter supports scala 2.11. > > Thanks, > moon > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:50 AM Eric Charles <e...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Two facets/questions here: >> >> 1. Are we willing to support both 2.10 and 2.11, or move to 2.11 >> (dropping 2.10 support) ? >> >> 2. Spark default build is now 2.11, not sure the other interpreters >> support 2.11 (last time I looked Flink, it was not supported - didn't >> look scaling...). So would we agree to have partial 2.11 support (only a >> portion of the interpreters)? >> >> >> On 23/02/16 17:03, moon soo Lee wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > There're some related issues and some discussions in it. >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-605 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-450 >> > >> > So far, no patch or pullrequest has been created. It'll be very nice if >> > we could have patch for 2.11. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > moon >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:59 AM Jordan G <jor...@ravellaw.com >> > <mailto:jor...@ravellaw.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Is there any work being done, people also interested in >> > collaborating on, and/or useful resources for getting Zeppelin to >> > work with Scala 2.11? >> > >> > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
