On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, James R. Frysinger wrote:
> That was a bad assumption on your part...
I plead guilty, Jim.
> ...
> In the future, I shall try to remember not to post anything
> until the whole exchange is over or to obscure anything that might
> enable others to chime in.
I like your proposed solution for your reason (limited
circulation if so intended), and also because it accurately preserves
the e-mail address of the primary recipient (when intended), which the
UC Server continues to delete almost always.
You will be pleased to know that my e-mail supporting your
message bounced from the MSFC Server, but the copy to the other person
at MSFC appears to have slipped through. Is he a co-author? Do you
suppose he will discuss my support e-mail with the author?
Gene.
