That works for me, Greg, but some people here don't like the prefixes
hecto, deca, deci, and centi except for a few special cases. I think
they're fine, though.

Jim

Gregory Peterson wrote:
> 
> Why not square hectometre (hm²)? The symbol is easily explained as "Hundred Metres 
>on each side"
> 
> In a recent conversation with the fellow responsible for water management in British 
>Columbia he told me that he was in the process of implementing cubic decametres (or 
>square "dekameters" if you choose) for large volumes of water. The are practical uses 
>for uncommon SI units. 1 dam³ is approx. 1.2 acre-feet.
> 
> BTW... cubic decametres is symbolized by dam³. A rather appropriate symbol for water 
>management. :)
> 
> greg
> 
> >>> Gene Mechtly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2001-02-16 20:57:48 >>>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Joseph B. Reid wrote:
> > ... I predict a long life for the nautical mile, knot, and hectare.
>         Your prediction might be realized, Joe, but I advocate meter
> squared (m2 as the simplified symbol) for the US, not hectare.
> Gene.

-- 
James R. Frysinger                  University/College of Charleston
10 Captiva Row                      Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Charleston, SC 29407                66 George Street
843.225.0805                        Charleston, SC 29424
http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644

Reply via email to