Great humor from you, Bill, for the nth time, where n >> 1.
Gene.
......................................
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Bill Potts wrote:
> Gene:
>
> You are quite right. I believe you've been right at least twice before.
> <chuckle>
>
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Bill Potts wrote:
> > ...
> > (Remember, if you do something "once more" or "one more time," then you've
> > done it twice.)
>
> Bill,
>
> I believe you mean "at least twice, and perhaps more than twice" as, for
> example:
>
> "I have argued in favor of metric-only labeling 100 times. If I argue
> for metric-only labeling "once more" or "one more time" my count will be
> 101 times, which is more than twice."
>
> Gene.
