Precisely, Bill (Potts).  Thanks for your explicit clarification
of my intended meaning.
...................
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Bill Potts wrote:
> ...
> One does something once, twice, three times, four times, ... 101 times, ...
>
> In that series, 101 times is certainly more that twice, with no
> qualification of "twice" required...

Reply via email to