2002-01-05

Bill,

These constant brain farts have got to stop.  The stench is killing me.

John


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 2002-01-05 10:10
Subject: [USMA:17213] Re: The number twelve and the universe!!


> I wrote:
> "One and one twelfth (1 plus 1/10)  is written as 1.1 One and eleven
> twelfths
> (1 plus 1/A) is written as 1.A."
>
> Oops. That second parenthetical item should be "1 plus A/10."
>
> Bill Potts, CMS
> Roseville, CA
> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Stephen Davis
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 04:10
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:17209] Re: The number twelve and the universe!!
>
>
> Oh, but there is, Daniel!!  Although 10 only really divides itself into 2
> and 5, ALL other numbers divide evenly into 10!!
>
> All numbers from one to ten and beyond divide by ten!!  Apart from 1, 2,
3,
> 4, 6, every number divides by 10!!
>
> Add factors of 10 to all these numbers, eg, 2/10 =0.2, 20/10=2, 200/10=20,
> 2000/10=200!!
>
> Try the same with 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7,8, 12, 16 and see what happens!!
>
> 10's closest competitor in the division stakes is 2 and it pales next to
10,
> which is the ultimate factor!!
>
> Yes 10 only divides by 2 and 10, but every other number divides by 10!!
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Bishop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:06 AM
> Subject: [USMA:17206] Re: The number twelve and the universe!!
>
>
> > 2002-01-04 20:43:43, "Adrian Jadic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > the 12 base system is limited and that the 10-base is better.
> >
> > Place-value notation applies equally well to all bases other than 0 and
1.
> There's nothing special about base-10 except that it is the base we are
most
> familiar with.
> >
>

Reply via email to