Aren't we beating a dead horse [Firehydrant Degrees] to pieces? D. -----Original Message----- From: kilopascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: February 28, 2002 23:31 Subject: [USMA:18466] Re: whatever happened to centigrade
>2002-02-28 > >Was that an oral temperature? Anal readings are suppose to be 0.5�C higher. >I've even heard of readings being taken under the arm pits, but I have no >idea what temperature one would consider normal for that. Does anybody >know? >John >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
