Barbara and/or Bill Hooper wrote:
> 
> on 4/4/2002 11:31 PM, James R. Frysinger at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I doubt that such a law would be constitutional.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Congress has the explicit Constitutional power to establish a system of
> weights and measures. How can it be unconstitutional to require that all
> measuring devices made and sold in the US must be able to measure in the
> officially "preferred sysem" (SI) established by Congress?
> 
> Regards, Bill Hooper
> college physics teacher (retired), USA (Florida)

        Good grief. Here I am about to patent and market my Reallygood Raisin
Scoop to people interested in comparative studies of the raisin content
in raisin-bran breakfast cereals and now you tell me that I've got to
mark it in SI units.

        What about people who market ring gauges for jewelry? How about thread
gauges -- does that mean that all threaded fasteners now must be rated
in metric units, even non-metric fasteners? How about those measuring
sticks used by lumbermen to estimate the number of board-feet in a log?
NIST SP 811 doesn't give a conversion for "board foot" and SI 10
explicitly declines to do so, saying that the definition of a board foot
used nominal and not actual measurements.

Jim

-- 
Metric Methods(SM)           "Don't be late to metricate!"
James R. Frysinger, CAMS     http://www.metricmethods.com/
10 Captiva Row               e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charleston, SC 29407         phone/FAX:  843.225.6789

Reply via email to