Of kilopascal
"The article made me think and wonder if when these foreign engineers
are contracted to design products for American companies,"

I have some experience of US clients, so here is my response.

It is not common for me to use measurement units in my work but it does
occasionally happen (as you can see from previous postings). Being
British means that I have few problem thinking in old units if required
and it merely feels like stepping back in time.

Being a foreign subcontractor always means there is one more issue to be
careful about. The competition is against US companies and the manager
may have taken a bold step to go 'foreign'. I am often in tough
negotiations and merely being foreign can be used as argument against an
idea. I even try to avoid UK spelling when communicating to US clients.


" do they do it in SI or in FFU?"

I respond to the need of the client. I provide the client with the
benefit of knowledge from sources in the US and elsewhere, therefore
there would be metric influence. Usually I translate into non-metric
units in conversation in the same way that a German speaker uses English
for an English speaker.


"So, would foreign Engineers give in and use FFU to satisfy an American
client"

Yes I do.


" and then maybe use their FFU experience on other projects not related
to America?"

No I don't.


"Would they be a force to change American habits of using FFU to that of
using SI?"

Of course. International contacts do cross-fertilise. How much is
another question that depends on the project.


"In this particular article, these engineers are from the Indian company
of Infosys Technologies, Ltd.  

Note that India is a former British colony and they adopted many British
traditions (driving on the left, UK plugs). I am sure that the British
attempted to use UK measurements in India before independence.

 
"Would these Indian Engineers attempt to convince their American Client
that using metric is more cost effective in the long term?"

I doubt it. My experience with Indian engineers is that you get exactly
what you ask for (even if it is not what you meant).


"Would they do their designs in metric and if required convert them to
FFU if the client demands it? Or would they work completely in FFU?"

It could be either. It would be influenced by whether they were on-site
in the US (using US tooling/methods) or off-site in India (Indian
tooling/methods).


"If Engineering is going to be outsourced, this is the perfect
opportunity for bringing metric into US made products on a more subtle
approach."

International contacts will always be good for internationalisation.


"Kind of like sneaking it in the back door.  And thus creating a greater
demand for such things as metric sized steel, metric fasteners, etc."

I wouldn't place too much emphasis on subcontracting of technical work.
Bigger influences are likely to be:
* buying in supplies
* deliberate manufacturing to sell internationally


--
Terry Simpson
Human Factors Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.connected-systems.com
Phone: +44 7850 511794 

Reply via email to