> Of kilopascal

I have to repeat that this is a rare issue for me. Most of my recent
work is with software user interfaces. But to continue...


> If you are working with an American client on an Engineering project
> and the issue of measurement systems or standards never arises,
> would you feel free to use SI?

Yes. But I would have to be very confident that the issue would never
arise to my detriment in the future.


>So, Terry, would you be compelled to point out to a client if
>he specifies FFU that all other equipment on the project is SI
>and his choice of FFU is going to be a problem?

Yes, in the exact way that you express it. I would regard it as my duty,
and that of everyone working on the project, to point out a problem due
to incompatibilities.

Incidentally, my clients include females.

I would also remark if there was a 'metric standard' relevant to the
project, although I would research my information very carefully. It
always helps to be able to have the exact document in a meeting or give
an exact reference.

If there is no problem of compatibility, then I would think carefully
about whether to raise it and how. I have had some success with
recommending more use of SI to UK clients merely because it is a 'good
thing'.

With US clients being a 'good thing' would be necessary but not
sufficient. I am more cautious because of the problems of a foreigner
recommending the 'foreign' metric system.

I sometimes try to make progress by discussing ways of
internationalisation and saving costs over the product lifecycle. I try
to ensure there is no hard coding of old units in software or
documentation.


>Would you feel compelled to "educate" your client who may assume
falsely
>that all other contractors on a project are using FFU?

No, I would not feel compelled unless it was a problem as discussed
above. If there is a bad conclusion being drawn on the basis of a false
assumption then I might mention it.


>Would you feel compelled to point out that a product your customer is
>wanting to build in FFU may not be marketable in most of the world?

No, I would not feel compelled. But international selling is one reason
why I would choose to mention it.


>And would you feel compelled to inform him if you have proof, that the
>product/project would be so many dollars cheaper if he used metric in
>design and specification of parts.

Yes, in the exact way that you express it. I would regard it as my duty,
and that of everyone working on the project, to point out a way of
saving money.

--
Terry Simpson
Human Factors Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.connected-systems.com
Phone: +44 7850 511794 

Reply via email to