on 4/29/2002 6:36 PM, Brian J White at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> why do people 
> have a problem with the term and loose measurement "light-year"?

On this metric discussion list, the main reason not to like the light-year
is that it's not SI.

An argument I've read on this list (but don't think is as important) as the
"not SI" one) is that the year used to determine the light year is not
clearly defined. That argument is countered by the fact that none of the
measurements that are typically reported in light-years is very accurate
anyway; therefore, it doesn't matter which one of the several kinds of
"year" is used. 

As long as light years are used as a loose measurement, there are not very
many good arguments against it, except for one: It's not SI, therefore we
lose all the good things we can do with such values when they and all other
values are expressed in a coherent, rational system like SI.

There are also those who don't like the light-year because they do not like
to have a length unit (the light-year) that is dependant on a unit of
something else (like year of time). However, the current definition of the
metre is the distance light travels in a certain fraction of a second. So
why is that so bad when it comes to the light-year? (Those who don't like
the light-year tend also not to like the current official definition of the
metre, either.)

There are others who DO LIKE the light-year and give arguments about how
easy it is to visualize large distances in light-years instead of terametres
and exametres and other SI units* . I just don't believe anyone can
visualize such enormous distances (or the enormously fast speed of light for
that matter) in any unit at all. We can do things with those values
(especially in SI) intellectually, like making comparisons, calculating
relationships, etc., but we cannot visualize or really comprehend them
(IMHO).


Regards, Bill Hooper
physics professor (retired), Florida, USA

*There are those who will say that I should have referred to terametres and
exametres as "other multiples of the SI unit, metre" instead of "other SI
units".

 ========================
 Keep It Simple - Make It Metric!
 ========================


Reply via email to