maybe Americans should see public transportation in europe!

it is great!

the subway network in berlin is awesome and here drove the first subway in
the world. I often prefer subway because it is faster, less stress and no
search for parking lot. in urban centers parking cost upto 1 �/h
----- Original Message -----
From: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wizard of OS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "U.S. Metric Association"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [USMA:20863] RE: President Carter


> 2002-07-07
>
> Americans are very dependant on their cars.  Public transportation is very
> limited, and is used mostly by the poor.  As for myself, I can not imagine
> using it.  By any method other than my car, to go to places like, work,
the
> gym and shopping, would take me hours.
>
> I have two cars.  It is needed because if one breaks down and is in need
of
> service, I have the other to use.  I use both on a rotating basis so they
> are both "exercised" regularly.  They both consume about 15 $ (15 �) per
> week.  If we paid world prices, it would cost me 3 times more.  But, I
would
> have to pay it and could not restrict my movements.
>
> I guess the government feels it would be an unnecessary burden on
consumers
> to make them pay so much for fuel.  It would weaken the economy
> tremendously.  Many could not afford it.
>
> For the government or others to expand the public transportation system
> would be considered a joke.  No one would accept such a solution.  People
> feel there is a freedom in having one's own vehicle with cheap fuel.
>
> The US may not need to charge world prices for fuel, but they should
charge
> enough to build good roads and maintain the ones they have without having
> the DOTs (Departments of transportation) in the red, meaning in debt.
>
> John
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wizard of OS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "U.S. Metric Association"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, 2002-07-07 07:43
> Subject: Re: [USMA:20863] RE: President Carter
>
>
> > this price is just too low!
> >
> > it just invites the people to waste energy!
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 4:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [USMA:20863] RE: President Carter
> >
> >
> > > 2002-07-06
> > >
> > > In Ohio, the amount varies with the gas station, but the average cost
of
> > low
> > > grade is about 0.35 �, about 0.37 � for mid-grade and 0.40 � for high
> > grade.
> > > I know that in Europe the cost is over 1 �/L
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't know what Diesel costs, as it isn't available at every
station.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Wizard of OS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, 2002-07-06 21:05
> > > Subject: [USMA:20863] RE: President Carter
> > >
> > >
> > > > how much is a liter benzin?
> > > >
> > > > the US is the biggest energy waster!
> > > >
> > > > they have to increase taxes on bezin in order to make the people
> realize
> > > how
> > > > to save energy!
> > > >
> > > > those money could be used for metrication!
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 7:06 PM
> > > > Subject: [USMA:20853] RE: President Carter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > 2002-07-06
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a strange American attitude, that goes beyond metrication.
> No
> > > one
> > > > > ever looks at the long term savings, just the initial start-up
> costs.
> > > > >
> > > > > As an example: road construction and repair.  Instead of charging
> more
> > > for
> > > > > gasoline with a higher tax, the gas price is kept low.  The
revenue
> > > > > collected for road work is insufficient to pay for constructing a
> > decent
> > > > > road.  The government thinks they are getting off cheap with low
> bids,
> > > but
> > > > > those low bids translate into roads that don't last through the
> > winters.
> > > > > So, the following summer, the same road built or repaired the
summer
> > > > before
> > > > > now is in need of repair because it is full of pot holes.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you add the cost of the yearly maintenance to the original
cost,
> it
> > > > > actually costs more, not only in money but in aggravation to the
> user
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > road.  The state road authorities usually don't have the money to
> pay
> > > for
> > > > > all of this repair and in some cases they must constantly borrow
in
> > > other
> > > > > cases the road is not repaired.   Borrowed money must be paid back
> > with
> > > > > interest, the result being even less money for road repair, which
in
> > > turn
> > > > > requires more borrowing.  The cycle never ending.
> > > > >
> > > > > The post office is in the same mess.  They are virtually bankrupt
> > > because
> > > > > they don't want to raise the price of postage to the same levels
of
> > > other
> > > > > countries.  For years they bragged that the American Postal system
> was
> > > the
> > > > > best in the world because you could mail a letter across the
country
> > at
> > > > half
> > > > > the cost other countries charge to mail letters.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's almost as if the only reason not to raise the prices of gas
and
> > > > postage
> > > > > is so the US can brag to the world that we can do it cheaper, thus
> we
> > > are
> > > > > better.  But, we do get what we pay for.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, 2002-07-06 07:02
> > > > > Subject: [USMA:20847] RE: President Carter
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Of Pat Naughtin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Whether it is true or false, it is a variation of common
arguments
> > put
> > > > > > up against change.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >'1) cost plus on government contracts is going
> > > > > > >to be a much bigger PLUS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Change costs money"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >'2) it'll hurt US manufacturing by making it easier for those
> > > > > > >foreigners to sell their products here (without conversion
> > > > > > >to US measurements)'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Those who have already changed will have an advantage"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Terry Simpson
> > > > > > Human Factors Consultant
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > www.connected-systems.com
> > > > > > Phone: +44 7850 511794
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to