Dear Joe,

What you say is quite right, but I think it leaves out the long and
continuous support that the USA has provided to the development of firstly
the metric system and subsequently the International System of Units. To
summarise this briefly:

Since independence, in 1783, the USA has made many attempts at converting
from the inefficient old ways of measuring to the simpler metric units.

Thomas Jefferson (1743/1826) and John Quincy Adams (1767/1848) recommended
conversion to a metric system for the USA to replace the existing Imperial
system sometime before 1784. To put this into context you might recall that
1785 was the year that the USA legislated for the introduction of decimal
currency, which took place in 1793.

Thomas Jefferson independently developed a system of measures very similar
to the French decimal metric system. He differed from the French in that he
wanted the metre to be the length of a pendulum that beats seconds because
other countries could readily reconstitute that at any time.

I don't think we can underrate the effect that support from the USA had on
the development of the metric system in France and in Europe generally. I
think that the support of this 'new' nation was crucial to the social and
political mood of the times.

Secretary of State John Quincy Adams again recommended the adoption of the
decimal system of measurement for the USA in 1821, but this time he was
referring to the metric system as it was used in France. He wrote regarding
the French metric system: �Considered merely as a labor-saving machine, it
is a new power, offered to man, incomparably greater than that which he has
acquired by the new agency which he has given to steam. It is in design the
greatest "invention" of human ingenuity since that of printing.�

When the next attempt was made to convert the USA to metric, in 1866,
several errors were made. Reasons for this failure centre around the ideas
that the various laws all called for voluntary conversion to the new units,
and that they all insisted on using a dual systems of units during the
transition from the old to the new.

For example when the first attempt to convert was made in 1866 the USA
Congress authorised the use of the metric system for measuring weights and
legal in contracts, dealings and court actions; but the same bill also
retained the use of the colonial measures. At the same time, other nations
were introducing the new units and making the use of the metric system
compulsory.

The United States was among the original 17 signatories to the Treaty of the
Metre in 1875, establishing an international bureau to supervise standard
weights and measures. Among other things, this treaty established the
International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) to provide standards of
measurement for worldwide use.

Since 1875, the USA has continuously supported the 'Treaty of the Metre'
financially, diplomatically, and politically. This support from the USA and
the other 47 signatories of the 'Treaty of the metre' have led us to the
not-too-bad position we are in today with an SI that is universally
respected and that is making gains in the last bastion of old measures, the
USA, on an almost daily basis.

Regards,

Pat Naughtin CAMS
Geelong, Australia

on 2002-07-13 11.04, Joseph B. Reid at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The SI unit of inductance is the henry, named after the American physicist
> Joseph Henry (1797-1878).  Eight Americans have served or are serving on
> the Comit� International  des Poids et Mesures (CIPM).  If I remember
> correctly, American laboratories have participated in the latest work in
> determining the second, and the speed of light, which is now used to define
> the metre.
> 
> Joseph B.Reid
> 17 Glebe Road West
> Toronto  M5P 1C8             Tel. 416 486-6071
> 

Reply via email to