>Dear All,

I now write the date in 13 Oct 2002 form .  Otherwise I go crazy trying to 
switch depending on which country I am in.  No one has objected.

Although it is interesting that the US customs forms insist on dd/mm/yyyy
and the internal government forms are mm/dd etc.

One wonders why the TABD carries so much weight.

John Nichols


>At 04:28 PM, 14 October 2002 +0100, Tom Wade VMS Systems wrote:
>> >Today is 13 October 2002.
>>
>>If you are sure that your target audience is English speaking, I agree this
>>date format is optimal.  The point about ISO format is that it is 
>>preferable to
>>either the mm/dd/yy(yy) or dd/mm/yy(yy) that is in common use today.  Also,
>>there may be places where dates are important across a language boundary,
>>e.g. the dates on passports, credit cards, driving licenses etc.
>
>I did not mean to imply that my particular alphanumeric date format is 
>optimal. That would vary on the country and style. However, as long as the 
>month is done with letters rather than numbers, it is **much** less likely 
>to be misinterpreted, and (as long as the month is in someone's native 
>language) it is easier to assimilate than using numbers for the month.
>
>It might be said that an alphanumeric format is more robust in most 
>situations than an all-numeric format.
>
>If a date MUST be numeric only, the ISO 8601 format is just fine. I would 
>suggest that such a requirement is very unusual, and generally represents 
>laziness on the part of programmers.
>
>Until such time as the ISO format is widely recognized and understood, it 
>has no substantial cross-cultural advantage over an alphanumeric format.
>
>At 06:10 PM, 14 October 2002 +0100, Markus Kuhn wrote:
>>And ISO 8601 explicitely says that it does *not* aim at replacing these.
>>All ISO aims at is replacing all other *all-numeric* formats, such as
>>10/13/02 or 13.10.02, and there can't be anything wrong with that.
>
>I have no argument with this.
>
>
>Jim Elwell, CAMS
>Electrical Engineer
>Industrial manufacturing manager
>Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
>www.qsicorp.com

John Nichols  BE, Ph.D. (Newcastle), MIE (Aust)
Assistant Professor
Texas A&M University
Department of Construction Science
Langford AC
Rm: A414   MD 3137
College Station, TX 77843-3137

Electronic mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone:         979 845 6541
Facsimile:          979 862 1572
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

The greatest thing is to know when to speak
and when to keep quiet
Seneca the Younger (attributed)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to