There are TWO ways to handle, the issue. (1) Educate to reason and adopt 
or (2) Let the problem die a *natural daeth*. At least I am not aware if ISO 
ever wanted Dates to go the (2) way!
  Well, choice is OURS.
Brij B. Vij

>From: Markus Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [USMA:22708] Re: Date Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:10:19 +0100
>
>Jim Elwell wrote on 2002-10-14 13:54 UTC:
> > The vast majority of people the world over use a calender with named 
>months
> > (i.e., January, February, ...).
> >
> > We should write dates to make life easy for humans, not computers.
> >
> > Today is 13 October 2002.
>
>And ISO 8601 explicitely says that it does *not* aim at replacing these.
>All ISO aims at is replacing all other *all-numeric* formats, such as
>10/13/02 or 13.10.02, and there can't be anything wrong with that.
>
>Markus
>
>--
>Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
>Email: mkuhn at acm.org,  WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/>




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Reply via email to