2002-10-13

An excerpt from the review of a MEASURE FOR MEASURE by DAVID OWEN



In fairness, throwing out the clock is a priority for just a lunatic few.
But the same urge for consistency at any cost is often evident among wholly
rational metric advocates, who seldom acknowledge that there could be
situations in which coldly logical metric units work less well than quirkier
alternatives. An example is carpentry. The units in which American building
materials are measured are idiosyncratic in the extreme-they include gauges,
penny sizes, nominal dimensions, and a host of other anachronistic
absurdities-but the over-all system works well, in part because it arose
organically from human activity instead of being imposed from above by
theoreticians. The standard metric measuring tape was clearly not designed
by anyone who regularly worked with wood: a millimetre is smaller than the
tip of a builder's pencil and narrower than the blade of a saw, and the
closely packed, uniform gradations on the tape are hard to make out at a
glance except in bundles of five. In contrast, a customary American
tape-with its easily distinguishable divisions of sixteenths, eighths,
quarters, halves, inches, feet, and sixteen-inch framing intervals-is
harmoniously suited to the way in which it is used. The American building
industry will probably adopt the metric system someday, but American
carpenters are not idiots or Luddites for continuing to use a system that
works.




I think the Australian/New Zealand example would be perfect in refuting the
claims of the author that FFU is more suited for construction.  It has
nothing to do with the origins and evolution, and everything to do with
adapting to whatever is set before you.  It would be extremely intersting
how the Australians and New Zealanders who were comfortable with the
imperial measuring tape were able to eventually adjust to the metric one.
Would a carpenter in Australia and New Zealand today agree with the above
paragraph?

Do any of you Aussies here know anyone old enough to remember once working
inches?  Could you get talk with that person(s) and see what it was like to
work in inches, what it was like to go through the change, and what it is
like now?  People who actually used both systems are the only real judges as
to which system is better.

And yes,  American carpenters are idiots and luddites if they turn their
nose at metric without even giving it a chance.

John

Reply via email to