Joseph B. Reid wrote: >>Terry Simpson asked: >>"the International System of Units (SI), which is the modern form of the >>metric system." >> >>Does it mean that >'modern form of the metric system' = 'SI' >? > > Yes
Thank you. So the logical inverse is: >>2. Non-SI unit = not a unit of the 'modern form of the >>metric system' > >It is your second statement that is too restrictive. You would be >laughed out of court if you eschewed litre, degree, tonne, hectare, >nautical mile, knot, bar, angstrom, and electronvolt. I am not worried about ridicule, only accuracy. I am merely attempting logical interpretation of CGPM statements (and logical inversions).
