Further clarification. First, work week sounds better than working week.
I'd say that, for their definition, day 1 of each work week is the Sunday, given that he's returning on day 1 of week 45 and resuming work on day 2. My preference for the punctuation would be a hyphen, rather than a period. Otherwise his notation is consistent with ISO-8601 (see Markus Kuhn's article at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html). Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-usma@;colostate.edu]On >Behalf Of Bill Potts >Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:58 >To: U.S. Metric Association >Subject: [USMA:22999] RE: Question about date format > > >I think there's a typo in his message. He probably means from WW44.4 to >WW45.1 -- meaning from day 4 of working week 44 to day 1 of >working week 45. > >The definition of working week 1 is almost certainly an internal company >thing. > >Bill Potts, CMS >Roseville, CA >http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-usma@;colostate.edu]On >>Behalf Of Jim Elwell >>Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:57 >>To: U.S. Metric Association >>Subject: [USMA:22998] Question about date format >> >> >>Does anyone know what the following date formats mean? The email >>is from an >>Intel plant in the Philippines. >> >> >>>From: "Ochoco, Larizelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: Tom Oaks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: SM# 07221168 (RMA K4491). >>>Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:33:27 +0800 >>> >>>I will be out of the office from WW45.4 to WW45.1 and will be >>back on WW45.2 >>>Pls note that I will have no access to emails. For any Banias concerns, >>>you may contact Ryan Chan at xxx. >>> >>>Thank you. >> >> >> >>Jim Elwell, CAMS >>Electrical Engineer >>Industrial manufacturing manager >>Salt Lake City, Utah, USA >>www.qsicorp.com >> >
