On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 17:13:12  
 John David Galt wrote:
...
>Jim Elwell speaks for me, too.  First, the prospect that your neighbors may be
>able to continue buying imperial sizes if they want them is not a danger or
>risk of any kind.  It's called freedom of choice.

But you can't have the cake and eat it, too, my friend.  Industry cannot expect to 
reap the benefits of a rational system like the SI fully while consumers are stuck in 
"old thinking".  This is akin to driving a car in full speed with the emergency breaks 
on!!  Plus the intangibles associated with the potential problems emerging from the 
use of unfriendly numbers.  A danger/risk too great in the long run.

>  Demanding the sizes you
>feel are rational but denying other people the sizes that work better for them
>is hypocrisy...

On the other hand to expect that "one size HAS to fit all" is also hypocrisy!  
Convenience is a *very subjective* concept.  The bottom line is, one can always find 
an alternative that is "nearly/practically as good", and yet keep rationality into the 
system (for example, is the difference between 1 oz and 30 mL that significant to 
cause such a stir?).  So, why not do it?

Marcus


____________________________________________________________
Get 25MB of email storage with Lycos Mail Plus!
Sign up today -- http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus 

Reply via email to