>>Such a letter would not have been written if there >>wasn't some sort of pressure on the state DOT to revert.
Caltrans has reaffirmed 2 or 3 time before, so I wouldn't take it as that. This is just a good RECENT version. Also I think Bill Potts had contacted Caltrans 6 months ago, and was told there was no pressure. >>I really hope California is a thorn in the side of all those states who continue to use FFU, and cost those states and their contractors money big time. >> That's been my hope all along, in this long weary battle. Nat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nat Hager III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, 2002-11-11 17:59 Subject: [USMA:23268] Caltrans reaffirms > Eureka! Reaffirmation as of September 2002. Linked and attached. > > Nat > > http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/design/m092702.pdf > >
