Joseph B. Reid wrote:
 The only relevant statement in that document is:
[...]

I am confused. Does that mean that the position of the NIST (quoted
again below) is not relevant?

[begin quote}
NIST wrote that it is confusing and redundant: a) to use the term "SI
metric" system because it implies that there are metric systems other
than the International System of Units (SI),

[end quote]
http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fpla/basis_jan1994.html

 > Terry should be more specific in his quotations.

I do not understand what you mean by 'more specific'. Are you asking for
more text in the quote, or less?

I am asking for the bibliographic reference of your statement. I was unable to find it in the www posting that you mentioned, which was to a posting about the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, not from NIST, Incidentalloy, I do not accept American statements about metric matters. I only accept BIPM and ISO documents as authoritative.

Joseph B. Reid
17 Glebe Road West
Toronto M5P 1C8 Telephone 416-486-6071

Reply via email to