I recently flew on Air Canada and everything was metric all the way to Houston. Except the pilots kept telling me the height in feet. Even the stupid doulbe displays of QANTAS on the distance to destination were only in metric.

Why the height in feet?

By the way if you want to fly a nice airline Air Canada was really great and the US customs in Hawaii and Calgary were first class.

John

X-EM-Version: 5, 0, 0, 0
X-EM-Registration: #3003520714B31D032830
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: EarthLink MailBox 5.0.7.9 (Windows)
From: "Michael Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [USMA:24520] Re: hPa
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 14:36:22 -0500
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 US Aviation does use inHg, however on upper air charts, they are in Hpa
levels (constant pressure level charts), decameter altitudes and Celsius
temperatures only, all by the NWS. All airport temperatures are in Celsius
everywhere. I've found that at a lot of airports, pilots have a choice of
looking at Metars or the old SA's. many choose the latter which gives
temperature in Fahrenheit. But at least we have the choice.

On another subject, recently flew on Lufthansa, in their inflight magazine
all articles in English use feet and inches which irks me, I had to refer
to the German side to get metric units. Same goes for the airshow, moving
map display with altitude temperature and distance on it. I'm writing to
complain. Believe i already complained about this last year.

Mike Payne
Potomac Falls Virginia


> [Original Message]
> From: Han Maenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Date: 15/12/02 13:01:19
> Subject: [USMA:24000] Re: hPa
>
> Doesn't US aviation use the inch of mercury 99% of the time? The US has
> rejected international METAR/TAFs, because they are too metric as they do
> not use inHg, visibility in yards and statute(!) miles etc. etc.
>
> Han
> .
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, 2002-12-15 1:13
> Subject: [USMA:23987] hPa
>
>
> >                             2002 December 14
> > Do not say the US National Weather Service prefers hPa over kPa.
> The Federal Aviation Administration made the call.  FAA did this for
safety.
> The numbers for mbar and hPa are the same.
> Given that aviation in the USA uses hPa, NWS uses the same unit
> > for the general public.
> >                         Robert Bushnell, PhD PE
> >                         Meteorologist
> >                         chair  ASTM committee E43 on SI Practice
> >
> >



--- Michael Payne
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
John Nichols BE, Ph.D. (Newcastle), MIE (Aust), Chartered Professional Engineer
Assistant Professor
Texas A&M University
Department of Construction Science
Langford AC
Rm: A414 MD 3137
College Station, TX 77843-3137

Electronic mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone: 979 845 6541
Facsimile: 979 862 1572
-----------------------------------------------------------------
a fronte praecipitium a tergo lupi

in front a precipice, behind a wolf
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to