In 1989, I bought a 24 carat gold chain in Hong Kong. The invoice showed its
mass in both taels and grams. I got if for official price for gold on the
day I bought it, plus 30 HK dollars for workmanship. (I was with someone who
was a friend of the store owner.)

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]



-----Original Message-----
From: kilopascal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 20:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; U.S. Metric Association
Subject: Re: [USMA:24552] RE: Non Metric Recipe Du Jour


2003-01-21

Sure it is included.  It looks like from the definition below that it is
strongly related to British Imperial/British Colonial units.  I just wonder
if it is still in use and if so, if it has been redefined to a rational
metric value like the European pounds set equal to 500 g.




tael or tahil
a traditional unit of weight used throughout eastern Asia. During the
colonial period, the tael was more or less standardized throughout the
region at 4/3 ounce avoirdupois (1/16 catty, 1/12 pound, or about 37.8
grams). In Japan, however, the tael was identified with a slightly smaller
traditional unit and is considered equal to 1.323 ounces (37.51 grams). The
tael is usually considered equal to the Chinese liang.


John




----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2003-01-21 20:08
Subject: [USMA:24552] RE: Non Metric Recipe Du Jour


> You mean that you no longer include the tael in FFU?
>
> A very sad tael indeed.
>
> Bill Potts, CMS
> Roseville, CA
> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> >Behalf Of kilopascal
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 15:36
> >To: U.S. Metric Association
> >Subject: [USMA:24551] RE: Non Metric Recipe Du Jour
> >
> >
> >2003-01-21
> >
> >FFU was not meant as an alternative name for USC or Imperial.  It was
meant
> >as a catch-all phrase for ALL non-SI units.  Even Chinese ones.  But, for
> >all practical purposes FFU is taken to mean USC and Imperial because they
> >are the only remaining "systems" still left.  Or at least the only ones
> >looking for international acceptance.
> >
> >John
>

Reply via email to