2003-01-22
Do you remember what the mass was in both grams and
tael? Was the tael at that time equal to 37.8 g or 50 g?
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 2003-01-22 03:13
Subject: [USMA:24554] RE: Non Metric Recipe Du
Jour
> mass in both taels and grams. I got if for official price for gold on the
> day I bought it, plus 30 HK dollars for workmanship. (I was with someone who
> was a friend of the store owner.)
>
> Bill Potts, CMS
> Roseville, CA
> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kilopascal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 20:39
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: Re: [USMA:24552] RE: Non Metric Recipe Du Jour
>
>
> 2003-01-21
>
> Sure it is included. It looks like from the definition below that it is
> strongly related to British Imperial/British Colonial units. I just wonder
> if it is still in use and if so, if it has been redefined to a rational
> metric value like the European pounds set equal to 500 g.
>
>
>
>
>
> John
