On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:51:58 Han Maenen wrote: >Marcus and all, > >About their absence there is nothing on their site. Over the years after >2000 there are only two entries on 'metric' on their site when using Search. >But in their Mid Year Report 1999, p. 28-29, they pretended to support >optional metric labelling in the USA. It is a pdf document. Indeed, I would >ask why didn't they attend this forum?
Hmm... Perhaps the question would be how relevant that forum is after all. BTW, this is indeed an interesting question. Does this forum have ANY CLOUT whatsoever in this FPLA debate? Maybe someone here could answer that. >...BTW: the BWMA is also whetting its knives for 2010. It is on their site: >http://www.bwma.org >They want to challenge the directive in the courts. >... He, he, he... Let them try and make fools out of themselves!!! They'll evidently *certainly* lose (they have in UK, so...). My only worry would be their exposure in the media and command pity from people with the consequential flow of support. This is perhaps the only major concern I'd have though. Marcus ____________________________________________________________ Get 25MB of email storage with Lycos Mail Plus! Sign up today -- http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus
