2003-02-18
 
Blumrich's book and In Search of Ancient Gods were written in the 70s.  Even though SI was around since 1960, most engineers at the time did not use it.  They still used "technical" metric, where the kilogram was both a unit of force and mass.  The point is confusion still exists when both the kilogram is used as a force unit and a mass unit.
 
That may or may not be the source of any error.  This site disagrees with your definition of specific impulse.  The last section states:
 

The specific impulse is:

Isp = ueq/ge

where

Isp = specific impulse
ueq = total impulse / mass of expelled propellant
ge = acceleration at Earth's surface (9.8 m/s2)

And since we are approximating the speed of a gas with a constant velocity; the momentum of the escaping gas is:

p = mv

where

p = momentum (kg m/s)
m = mass (kg)
v = velocity (m/s)

Notice how masses cancel out and therefore we the Isp is just the velocity of the exhaust gas (Ve) divided by the gravitational attraction of the Earth (ge).

 
http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/Propulsion/3-how-you-calculate-specific-impulse.html
 
 
If the velocity of the gas is in metres per second, and that is divided by the gravitational attraction in metres per second squared, then the resultant unit is seconds.
 
Am I missing something here?
 
 
John
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Mechtly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2003-02-17 19:24
Subject: [USMA:24885] Re: Nasa's Germans used metric

> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, kilopascal wrote:
> > ... Blumrich is quoted in the book In Search of
> > Ancient Gods ...
> > "... I discovered that Ezekiel's spaceship has very
> > credible ...
> >   Specific impulse = 2,080 sec ...
>
> Blumrich's unit (sec) is an error. The SI unit of specific impulse is
> the same as exhaust velocity, meter per second (m/s), not seconds.
>
> The error arises from dividing pounds force by pounds mass without
> proper distinction between force and mass.  The error: pound/pound = 1.
>
> > "... Weight of construction = 63,300 kg..."
>
> Once again, Blumrich fails to properly treat the kilogram as the SI
> unit of "mass". The newton is the SI unit of "weight" (a force, as are
> weight's companion forces; lift, thrust, and drag in aerospace dynamics).
>
> Blumrich would be well advised to stick to questions of structural designs
> and not to dabble in problems of aerospace dynamics.
>
> Gene.
>

Reply via email to