Dear Baron and All,

> I see the article contains typical linguistic gymnastics to sort of imply
> that the US is not alone.

This reminds me of the little girl who insists that she must wear her pink
fluffy shoes to school today:

'Because all the other girls will be wearing them.'
or 
'Jenny and Martha and Bernice and Julie and Maria and Carol are all wearing
theirs'.

I am often amused by the nations that are quoted as being non-metric to
bolster the non-metric stance of individuals in the USA.

Usually they select two (almost always two) from this list: Burma, Liberia,
Libya, and Myanmar. The only two that I have yet to see combined are Burma
and Myanmar � but I have no doubt that I will see this one day � I have seen
all the other combinations.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin LCAMS
Geelong, Australia

on 2003-03-11 00.29, Carter, Baron at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I see the article contains typical linguistic gymnastics to sort of imply
> that the US is not alone.
> 
> "The Metric System is used in nearly every country in the world, with the
> exception of the U.S.,"
> 
> What is the purpose of the word 'nearly'.  'Nearly' implies more than one
> country.  Yet there is only one country listed as an exception.  The
> statement is illogical.  The writer tries to imply that the US is not alone
> by inserting the word 'nearly'.  Unfortunately we see these linguistic
> liberties being taken daily in our news fodder.  Anyone who has done
> Marketing/Propaganda 101 knows the power of subtlety.
> 
> Whilst I am glad to see that another software company acknowledges the
> metric system, their press release could have been a lot more positive.
> 
> cheers
> Baron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nat Hager III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 08 March, 2003 14:13
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:25070] SYSPRO Releases Metric Version of Material Yield
> System (2)
> 
> 
> Someone might find interesting, though I might refer to the systems US
> legacy units vs. Standard Metric.
> 
> Nat
> 
> http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030303/lam007_1.html
> 

Reply via email to