|
2003-03-30
This is of extreme importance that all of you read these
articles and forward this information to as many people as possible. Our
freedoms and the protections of our Constitution are at stake. This is not
FREEDOM. This is neonaziism. A plan for world
domination.
Note step 5 of the PNAC plan. Do you really believe
that the US government can effect a regime change in China without starting a
nuclear holocaust?
John
The Death Certificate For Our
Republic
Project For The New American
Century:
The Death Certificate For Our Republic
By Michael Gaddy
Published 03. 2. 03 at 21:21 Sierra Time
I, like many other
supporters of the Constitution, have been asking since the 2000 election;
exactly what drives the foreign policy of the Bush Administration. The answer is
revealed in the doctrines of the Policy for the New American Century, (PNAC)
Neil Mackay, in the Scotland Sunday Herald, reveals the master plan now
driving this administration.
"A SECRET blueprint for US global
domination reveals that President Bush and his cabinet were planning a
premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before he took power
in January 2001.
The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the
creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-
president), Donald Rumsfeld (defense secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's
deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of
staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces
And Resources For A New Century, was written in September 2000 by the
neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC)."
This plan in its entirety can be found here. (http://www.newamericancentury.org/)
The plan
put forth by PNAC reveals, regardless of whether Saddam Hussein was in power in
Iraq, an attack there was preordained. Maybe this can explain why they continue
the war beat no matter how many times this administration is caught
prevaricating about Iraq.
Inside the document prepared by PNAC is the
following: "The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent
role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides
the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence
in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
The
document also outlines a "blueprint for maintaining global US preeminence,
precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international
security order in line with American principles and interests. This American
grand strategy must be advanced as far into the future as possible"
To
facilitate their plans, our military cannot be constrained by the constitution.
The plan calls our military, "the cavalry on the new American frontier." In
other words, the "new American frontier is wherever our government says it is."
If this is not a game plan of empire, I have never seen one.
The
thoughts brought forth in this document should scare the beejeezus out of anyone
who calls him or herself an American.
and:
The PNAC plan:
Supports
a "blueprint for maintaining global US preeminence, precluding the rise of a
great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with
American principles and interests."
This "American grand strategy" must
be advanced for "as far into the future as possible," the report says. It also
calls for the US to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major
theatre wars" as a "core mission."
1. Refers to key allies such as
the UK as "the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global
leadership."
2. Describes peacekeeping missions as "demanding American
political leadership rather than that of the United Nations."
3. Reveals
worries in the administration that Europe could rival the USA.
4. Says
"even should Saddam pass from the scene" bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will
remain permanently -- despite domestic opposition in the Gulf regimes to the
stationing of US troops -- as "Iran may well prove as large a threat to US
interests as Iraq has."
5. Spotlights China for "regime change" saying
"it is time to increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia".
This, it says, may lead to "American and allied power providing the spur to the
process of democratization in China"
6. Calls for the creation of "US
Space Forces", to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent
"enemies" using the Internet against the US. (How long will it be before those
of us who oppose this quest for empire, become the "enemy"?)
7. Hints
that, despite threatening war against Iraq for developing weapons of mass
destruction, the US may consider developing biological weapons -- which the
nation has banned -- in decades to come. It says: "New methods of attack --
electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be more widely available ... combat
likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the
world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target'
specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to
a politically useful tool."
8. Pinpoints North Korea, Libya, Syria and
Iran as dangerous regimes and says their existence justifies the creation of a
"worldwide command-and-control system."
Our European allies know of this
plan. Perhaps that is why the administrations plan for "regime change" is
meeting such opposition there.
Tam Dalyell, father of the House of
Commons in the UK, and one of the leading British voices against war with Iraq,
said: "This is garbage from right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks --
men who have never seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war.
Men like Cheney, who were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam War. This is a blueprint
for US world domination -- a new world order of their making. These are the
thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am
appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with a
crew which has this moral standing."
Ironically, the policies of PNAC
were first brought forth in Papa George's administration, but it was not well
received and the would-be world controllers backed off for the time being. Scott
McConnell of the American Conservative magazine says; "In the final year of the
first Bush administration, Paul Wolfowitz penned a memo under the aegis of then
Secretary of Defense Cheney, calling for the United States to ramp up its
defense spending in order to deter any other country from "even aspiring to a
larger regional or global role." China, Russia, Germany, and Japan were to be
intimidated from seeking more power in their own regions. After the Wolfowitz
draft was leaked to the press, it received widespread ridicule, and the Bush I
diplomats rushed to reassure allies that Wolfowitz's views did not truly reflect
American foreign policy.
But during the 1990s these did become the views
of the neoconservatives, packaged under the slogan "benevolent global hegemony"
touted by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The positions of the neoconservative
foreign policy team in exile were fleshed out in a PNAC book, Present Dangers,
which called for the U.S. to "shape the international environment to its own
advantage" by being "at once a European power, an Asian power, a Middle Eastern
power, and of course a Western Hemisphere power" and to "act as if instability
in important regions of the world : affect[s] us with almost the same immediacy
as if [it] was occurring on our own doorstep." In practice this meant assertive
risk-taking virtually everywhere. Jonathan Clarke, reviewing the volume in the
National Interest, wrote, "If the book's recommendations were implemented all at
once, the U.S. would risk unilaterally fighting a five-front war, while
simultaneously urging Israel to abandon the peace process in favor of a new
no-holds-barred confrontation with the Palestinians." This book has become the
blueprint for the foreign policy of George W. Bush."
The most alarming
part of this document is the proposals for our military. Those of us who believe
that we maintain a military for defense are in for a real shock. When this plan
is implemented there will have to be a name change in our government. We will no
longer have a department of defense; it will have to be changed to the
department of offense.
Does anyone really believe we can accomplish the
outlined military goals with an "all volunteer" force? Or will we once again be
required to subject our young people to a draft so they can be made indentured
servants to a government so as to "fight for freedom?" Don't forget Secretary of
Offense, Donald Rumsfeld, recently praised our "all volunteer' military as being
one where everyone is there by choice, yet days later froze all lengths of
service for the U.S. Marines and all forces in Korea until further notice.
This plan for world domination, written in 2000, called for raising our
outlay on military spending to 3.8 percent of our GNP from the then level of
3.5. With the last increase in military spending by this administration, we
reached the exact figure of 3.8!
The steps of this plan, which are being
followed to the letter by George W. Bush, will lead to the end of what little is
left of our Republic and a disaster for us as a nation on the world stage.
History is resplendent with the tragedies of nations that sought empire and
failed. We will be no different.
All allies will be repulsed at our
desire to dominate the world. It is happening already. Our European allies have
gone from those with headlines on 9/11 that proclaimed "We are all Americans
now,' to disgust with our leaders, our foreign policy and its intended goal of
world domination. Sure, we will be able to buy some allies, just as we have
Turkey, but we must be aware we have only purchased the support of the
government. The people of the world will never support a foreign power that
seeks to make them all victims of its democratization and moral superiority.
When we subdue Iraq, will the oil resources be given to the citizens? I
think not. A puppet government will be installed and the oil resources will be
channeled to US interests, just as is being done in Afghanistan. Why else would
a supposed "leader" of a country require 24/7 protection by US Special Forces
soldiers from his own citizens?
We call what we seek to impose on the
world, democracy. What majority of citizens in Afghanistan elected Hamid Karzai
to be head of the country? Could it be coincidence Karzai was a former Unocal
employee? Is it also coincidence the plan for the oil line across Afghanistan is
now being implemented? Could the Taliban have become military opponents of the
United States simply because they refused this same pipeline deal with Unocal
after being wined and dined in Texas back when Dubya was governor in 1997?
What will it take for the majority of citizens in this country to
realize we are becoming that which we fought so hard against 50+ years? By
continuing to implement this policy set forth by Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld,
Perle and Bush, do we not become the same as the Soviet Union whom we fought so
hard to defeat, costing us tens of thousands of lives and trillions of dollars?
One need only compare the proposed ideologies of our new neoconservative leaders
with those of Leon Trotsky!
Another thing this plan for world domination
will bring us here at home is terrorism too intense as to be imagined. When we
have separated ourselves from the other people of this planet by our quest for
domination, by what other means will they be able to retaliate? Does the thought
of Rome being invaded by the Barbarians bring forth any visions? If they invade
across our Southern Border, they will be assisted rather than opposed.
What will become of those here in this country who seek to remain loyal
to the Constitution? Will we not become just as much an opposing force to those
who seek world domination as those in other countries who do not wish to become
American subjects?
How much more of our personal resources will be
required to accomplish world domination? How much more of our freedoms?
Near the end of my career, I was afforded the opportunity of training
with several of the Soviet Unions Special Forces troops. (Spesnatz) I had an
occasion to trade an American "T" shirt with one of the Soviet soldiers for one
from his personal collection. I recognized the word "Spesnatz" in written
Russian, but was later told by one of the linguists in our unit what the
remainder of words on the shirt translated to in English. The complete
translation was as follows: Spesnatz, Vanguard Of World
Domination!
|
