I haven't been following this thread, but may be interesting to
someone...

-----------------------------------------------

2003 Belfast Telegraph Newspapers Ltd.  
Belfast Telegraph

October 10, 2003

LENGTH: 298 words

HEADLINE: M-way speed limit to rise in Republic

BYLINE: By Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BODY:
DRIVERS from Belfast to Dublin will be able to reach their destination
more quickly, under plans to increase the motorway speed limit in the
Republic.

The proposals to increase the limit from 70mph to 74.56mph (120kmh) are
likely to become law late next year.

The suggested new maximum speeds are part of a plan to make limits in
the Republic more consistent, as well as fulfilling a government
commitment to convert to metric measurements by 2005. 

The speed limit on many other types of road will drop in a bid to cut
accidents.

The new motorway limits will make it possible to drive the 72km distance
of the M1 motorway, from Dundalk to the outskirts of Dublin, in 36
minutes.

Travelling times will drop further when the Dundalk motorway bypass is
completed in 2006, and the Dundalk to Newry dual carriageway built about
a year later.

By then it should be possible to drive the 90km from the border to
Dublin Airport in about 45 minutes - a journey which currently takes
more than an hour.

Speed and distance signs in the Republic are confusing at present, with
road distances shown in kilometres and speed limits shown in mph.

A working group, commissioned by the government, recommended that limits
on some roads drop to 18.6mph (30kmh). The limit on many back country
roads will also be cut, to 49.7mph (80kph).

Under the proposals, the speed limit on primary roads, such as dual
carriageways and major single carriageway routes, will be rounded up
from 60mph to their nearest metric equivalent of 100kmh, a slight rise
to 62.1 mph.

Current roadside speed signs will be replaced with versions containing
the new restrictions.

The speed limit on UK motorways is 70mph.

The Conservative Party has pledged to increase it to 80mph.



----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Han Maenen
Sent: Monday, 2003 October 13 14:08
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:27169] Irish speedlimits


I have been following the Letters to the Editor pages in the Irish
Times, but no one has sent a letter about road metrication. I am certain
that if this decision had been made in Britain, many pro and contra
metric people would have reacted.

That is what the IAML says:

"Forced metrication is unnecessary, unwanted and undemocratic. Our
traditional measurements are well understood and perfectly appropriate
for day-to-day life. They do not need to be replaced in shops, on road
signs etc. Indeed, in so doing, our government is effectively cutting a
vast proportion of our population off from any real understanding of
measurement. Disenfranchising them from their right to measure. Most
people do not want the metric system. Take a survey yourself on the
street. You'll see what we mean. Worst of all, metrication has been
foisted on us with out the opinion of the Irish people being asked. In
our country, where in recent history, we have had to fight to be heard,
this is blatant arrogance on behalf of the government and shameful
complacency on behalf of the people at large. For more information,
contact us at our e-mail address below."

The URL is http://www.angelfire.com/ok4/iaml/
e-mail address IAML: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Han
Historian of Dutch Metrication, Nijmegen, The Netherlands


Reply via email to