On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:42:49   
 James Frysinger wrote:
>Well put, Carl.
>
>Indeed, the economic principles of a public good are involved here. Further, 
>to believe that information is free is not only naive but it has never been 
>generally correct. The existence of some free information does not imply that 
>all information is or should be free.
>
>Jim
>...
???  And may I respectfully inquire what you guys are meaning with this 'public good' 
thing, please?

In my dictionary, public good takes precedence over ANY other thing.  This, *to me* is 
a Christian principle *I* would always abide by.  In other words, I really don't care 
about things costing money or not if there could be a better good for people!!!

What I mean is, if I see something would be benefitial to others *WHO CARES* if it 
cost ME even thousands of dollars????  I'm not selfish (and please, I'm not accusing 
ANYONE of being selfish, by the way, before any of you jump on my throat for saying 
this, ok?!).  I have NO qualms whatsoever to partake the little I have or know with 
others!  This is an integral part of who I am or what I believe in!  Unless doing so 
would be illegal, of course!

Anyhow, I'm really tired of all this wrangling of having my intentions been blown way 
out of proportion and of continuing name calling and stuff like that.  So, this is 
probably the last I'll speak on this subject.  Besides I see no added benefit of 
continuing this discussion.

So, let's call it a day, or truce, or whatever, we all need some peace here, shall we? 
 (Thanks...)

Marcus


____________________________________________________________
Get 25MB of email storage with Lycos Mail Plus!
Sign up today -- http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus 

Reply via email to