|
Of course they are. Even if the Chinese were to use
their old units, they have been metricated a long time ago. With all of
the Chinese exports to the US it really means the US is being flooded with
metric products. The movement of the computer and electronics industry to
Asia has been a real powerful factor in the metrication of these
industries. American companies purchasing and using Asian (as well as
European) products in their equipment have to come to terms with rational metric
spacings, fasteners with metric threads, and other nuances that make working in
FFU an added headache.
But some American industries would rather have headaches
then convert their operations over to complete metric usage. Others just
give up and export their work to a metric country. Why try and metricate
an arrogant people hateful of metric when one can just close a plant or industry
and export it. People in India and China and elsewhere have no problem
working in metric.
One always pays a price for once arrogance and
stupidity. The US got away with it for a long time, but the time of
payback is now and it is hurting. Just look at how the euro is pounding
the dollar. The ever weaking dollar will prove to be a curse to the
American economy.
From Rowlett:
Note: The liang being equal to 50 g would make the tael
also equal to 50 g.
Keep in mind, that instruments don't exist in the old
units. People in metric countries use metric instruments. If the old
units continue to be used in name only, they have to be rationalised to
convenient metric values to make them usable. In metric countries a pound
of 453.6 g or even 454 g is clumsy. Thus, the shift to 500 g.
I'm sure the FFU-ists hate this but thankfully they do have
the power to do anything about it.
Euric
P.S. I cleaned out my mailbox the other day and erased
the posting you made about your daughter and others who did not understand
inter-FFU conversion factors. Could you repost it?
Thanks.
|
- [USMA:27963] China john mercer
- [USMA:27964] RE: China Bill Potts
- Chimpsarecute
